Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Atrocity Case Due to Death of Complainant and Lack of Evidence. Appeal under Section 378 CrPC fails as original complainant Shantaben Gulabbhai Bhil died and no other evidence supports conviction under Sections 354 IPC and 3(1)(11) SC/ST Act.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.04.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Patan, in Special Case (Atrocity) No.13 of 2008. The trial court had acquitted the respondents, Father Prasadji John and another, of offences punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(11) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The appeal was heard by a single judge of the Gujarat High Court. At the outset, the prosecution placed on record a letter from the Police Inspector, Radhanpur Police Station, dated 09.02.2026, along with a death certificate, stating that the original complainant, Shantaben Gulabbhai Bhil, who had been added as respondent No.2 vide order dated 16.06.2025, had died. The court noted that the original complainant was dead and there was no other evidence on record to support the appeal. Consequently, the court held that the appeal could not succeed and dismissed it. The judgment was delivered on 24/02/2026 by Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker.

Headnote

A) Criminal Appeal - Appeal against acquittal - Section 378 CrPC - Death of complainant - The State appealed against acquittal under Sections 354 IPC and 3(1)(11) SC/ST Act. The original complainant died during pendency of appeal. The court held that in absence of any other evidence, the appeal cannot succeed and dismissed it. (Paras 1-2)

B) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(11) - Insult or intimidation in public view - The trial court acquitted the accused as the prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt. The High Court found no perversity in the trial court's judgment and dismissed the appeal. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial court is perverse and requires interference by the High Court under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The judgment of acquittal dated 07.04.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Patan, in Special Case (Atrocity) No.13 of 2008 is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Appeal against acquittal
  • Death of complainant
  • Lack of evidence
  • Section 378 CrPC
  • Section 354 IPC
  • Section 3(1)(11) SC/ST Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:14623

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1140 of 2010

2026-02-24

Sanjeev J. Thaker

2026:GUJHC:14623

Ms. Megha Chitaliya, APP for the Appellant; Mr. M.M. Tirmizi for Respondent No.1; Notice unserved for Respondent No.2

State of Gujarat

Father Prasadji John & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal

Remedy Sought

State of Gujarat sought reversal of acquittal and conviction of respondents under Sections 354 IPC and 3(1)(11) SC/ST Act

Filing Reason

State aggrieved by acquittal of respondents by trial court

Previous Decisions

Trial court acquitted respondents in Special Case (Atrocity) No.13 of 2008 on 07.04.2010

Issues

Whether the judgment of acquittal is perverse and requires interference under Section 378 CrPC

Submissions/Arguments

Prosecution placed on record letter and death certificate showing death of original complainant

Ratio Decidendi

In an appeal against acquittal, if the original complainant dies and there is no other evidence to support the appeal, the appeal cannot succeed and must be dismissed.

Judgment Excerpts

Feeling aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.04.2010, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Patan, in Special Case (Atrocity) No.13 of 2008, for the offences punishable under Sections 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(11) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the appellant – State of Gujarat has preferred this appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. At the outset, the prosecution has placed on record the letter of the Police Inspector, Radhanpur Police Station dated 09.02.2026, addressed to the Public Prosecutor, along with the death certificate, stating that the original complainant - Shantaben Gulabbhai Bhil, who has been added as respondent No.2 vide order dated 16.06.2025, has died.

Procedural History

Trial court acquitted respondents on 07.04.2010. State filed appeal under Section 378 CrPC on 2010. During pendency, original complainant died. Appeal heard and dismissed on 24.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 378
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 354
  • Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: 3(1)(11)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Atrocity Case Due to Death of Complainant and Lack of Evidence. Appeal under Section 378 CrPC fails as original complainant Shantaben Gulabbhai Bhil died and no other evidence supports co...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute. Charter Party Agreement's Demurrage Clause Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Excepted Perils.