Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Dying Declarations Contradictory, Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused Under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 27
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Koli Rajeshbhai Chaturbhai and another for offences under Sections 302 and 498-A read with Section 114 IPC. The deceased Kasturben was married to accused Rajeshbhai and was allegedly harassed. On 05.10.1996, the accused allegedly poured kerosene and set her on fire. The deceased gave two dying declarations: one to the Executive Magistrate implicating her husband, and another to the police stating she caught fire accidentally. The trial court acquitted the accused due to inconsistencies. The High Court held that the dying declarations were contradictory and unreliable, and the trial court's findings were not perverse. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the acquittal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Reliability - Inconsistency - The court examined two dying declarations which were contradictory regarding the role of the accused. The first declaration to the Executive Magistrate implicated the husband, while the second to the police exonerated all accused. Held that such inconsistency creates doubt and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 5-8).

B) Criminal Law - Acquittal Appeal - Scope - Interference - The High Court's power in an appeal against acquittal is limited. Unless the findings are perverse or unreasonable, the appellate court should not interfere. Held that the trial court's appreciation of evidence was plausible and not perverse (Paras 9-10).

C) Criminal Law - Section 302 IPC - Murder - Dowry Death - The deceased died due to burn injuries. The prosecution alleged that the husband poured kerosene and set her on fire. However, due to inconsistent dying declarations and lack of independent witnesses, the conviction under Section 302 IPC was not sustainable. Held that benefit of doubt must be given to the accused (Paras 5-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial court is perverse and liable to be set aside, and whether the dying declarations are reliable and sufficient to convict the accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The judgment of acquittal passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhrangadhra in Sessions Case No.89 of 1998 is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration must be consistent and reliable
  • Acquittal appeal limited scope
  • Benefit of doubt
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • Section 114 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (02) 138

R/Criminal Appeal No. 1351 of 2003

2026-02-07

Bhargav D. Karia, P. M. Raval

Mr. K. M. Antani, APP for the Appellant; Notice served for Respondents

State of Gujarat

Koli Rajeshbhai Chaturbhai & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal

Remedy Sought

State seeks reversal of acquittal and conviction of respondents for murder and dowry death

Filing Reason

State aggrieved by acquittal of accused for offences under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC

Previous Decisions

Trial court acquitted accused in Sessions Case No.89 of 1998 on 14.08.2003

Issues

Whether the dying declarations are reliable and consistent? Whether the trial court's acquittal is perverse?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration before the Executive Magistrate is reliable and should be believed. Respondents argued that the dying declarations are contradictory and the trial court correctly acquitted them.

Ratio Decidendi

In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court should not interfere unless the findings are perverse. Inconsistent dying declarations create doubt, and benefit of doubt must be given to the accused.

Judgment Excerpts

The State has preferred the present appeal being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order of acquittal... The dying declarations are inconsistent and create doubt about the prosecution case.

Procedural History

FIR lodged on 05.10.1996 at Halvad Police Station. Chargesheet filed, case committed to Sessions Court as Sessions Case No.13 of 1997, later renumbered as Sessions Case No.89 of 1998. Trial court acquitted accused on 14.08.2003. State appealed to High Court on 2003.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 498-A, 114
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Dying Declarations Contradictory, Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused Under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Reduces Compensation by 50% in Motor Accident Case Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased traveling in goods vehicle (Chhota Hathi) with 40 passengers held equally negligent for accident with ST bus.