Gujarat High Court Directs Accommodation of Remaining Street Vendors Under Street Vendors Act, 2014 — Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Ordered to Rehabilitate 63 Vendors Within 8 Weeks. The court held that the Corporation must comply with its statutory duty under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 to accommodate all eligible street vendors identified in the survey.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 18
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajkumar Moharsing Kori, filed a Public Interest Litigation in a representative capacity seeking rehabilitation of vegetable and other street vendors under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. The petition sought accommodation of vendors at the same place or any other nearby place. During the hearing on 01.12.2025, the petitioner's advocate informed the court that out of 166 vendors listed in the paper-book, all except 63 had been accommodated and allotted places to carry out their commercial activities. The court called for a response from the respondent Corporation. The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation filed an affidavit-in-reply dated 19.12.2025 through its Deputy Estate Officer (South Zone), stating that after the enactment of the 2014 Act, the Corporation, in coordination with the Gujarat Urban Livelihood Mission (the nodal agency), undertook a comprehensive city-wide survey of street vendors through a duly appointed agency, Atharva Planning and Research Centre Private Ltd. The survey identified approximately 62,000 street vendors across the city. Upon due verification of records, eligibility, and continuity of vending activities, necessary Identity Cards were issued for allotment of vending zones. The Corporation submitted that the remaining 63 vendors would be accommodated within a period of 8 weeks. The court, after considering the submissions, directed the Corporation to accommodate the remaining 63 vendors within 8 weeks and file a compliance affidavit within two weeks thereafter. The court disposed of the petition and the connected civil application accordingly.

Headnote

A) Street Vendors - Rehabilitation - Accommodation - Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 - The petitioner sought rehabilitation of vegetable and other street vendors under the Act. The court noted that out of 166 vendors, 103 had been accommodated, but 63 remained. The Corporation filed an affidavit stating that a city-wide survey identified 62,000 vendors, and identity cards were issued. The court directed the Corporation to accommodate the remaining 63 vendors within 8 weeks and file a compliance affidavit. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the remaining 63 street vendors out of 166 identified in the petition are entitled to be accommodated/relocated under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, and whether the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation has complied with its obligations under the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation to accommodate the remaining 63 street vendors within a period of 8 weeks from the date of the order. The Corporation was also directed to file a compliance affidavit within two weeks thereafter. The petition and the connected civil application were disposed of accordingly.

Law Points

  • Rehabilitation of street vendors
  • Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act
  • 2014
  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Accommodation of vendors
  • Compliance with statutory scheme
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:16163-DB

R/Writ Petition (PIL) No. 204 of 2018 with Civil Application (For Direction) No. 1 of 2025

2026-02-27

Sunita Agarwal (Chief Justice), D.N. Ray

2026:GUJHC:16163-DB

Mr. Subramaniam Iyer (for applicant/petitioner), Mr. Deep D. Vyas (for opponent No. 2), Ms. Maithili Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader (for opponent Nos. 1, 3)

Rajkumar Moharsing Kori

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation seeking rehabilitation of street vendors under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014.

Remedy Sought

Rehabilitation of vegetable and other street vendors at the same place or any other nearby place under the Act.

Filing Reason

Non-accommodation of street vendors despite the enactment of the Street Vendors Act, 2014.

Issues

Whether the remaining 63 street vendors are entitled to accommodation under the Street Vendors Act, 2014? Whether the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation has complied with its obligations under the Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's advocate submitted that out of 166 vendors, 103 have been accommodated, but 63 remain without any order from the Corporation. Respondent Corporation submitted that a city-wide survey identified 62,000 vendors, identity cards were issued, and the remaining 63 vendors would be accommodated within 8 weeks.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, in coordination with the nodal agency, must ensure accommodation of all eligible street vendors identified in the survey under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. The Corporation's undertaking to accommodate the remaining 63 vendors within 8 weeks was accepted, and the court directed compliance.

Judgment Excerpts

By means of the present Public Interest Litigation, which has been filed in the representative capacity, the petitioner herein seeks rehabilitation of vegetable and other street vendors under the provisions Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014... In the affidavit-in-reply dated 19.12.2025 filed by the Deputy Estate Officer (South Zone), Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, it is submitted that after enactment of 2014 Act, the Corporation... undertook a comprehensive city wide survey of street vendors... The Corporation has submitted that the remaining 63 vendors would be accommodated within a period of 8 weeks.

Procedural History

The Public Interest Litigation was filed in 2018. During the hearing on 01.12.2025, the court was informed that 103 out of 166 vendors had been accommodated. The court called for a response from the Corporation, which filed an affidavit on 19.12.2025. The court then passed the final order on 27.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court "Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Decree: Tenant’s Non-Payment Claim Invalidated Due to Absence of Valid Notice" "Landlord’s eviction suit dismissed for failure to comply with procedural demand notice requirements under Maharashtra Rent Contro...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Accommodation of Remaining Street Vendors Under Street Vendors Act, 2014 — Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Ordered to Rehabilitate 63 Vendors Within 8 Weeks. The court held that the Corporation must comply with its statut...