High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Proceedings in PCR Complaint Sent by Post — Magistrate Failed to Follow Procedure Under Section 200 Cr.P.C. Before Referring to Police Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Complaint sent by post requires examination of complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before any further action; order under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. without such examination is illegal.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Yakoob Sharief, filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.86/2012 and proceedings in PCR No.95/2012 pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Chickballapura. The second respondent, Gopalappa, sent a written complaint by registered post to the JMFC, Chickballapura, which was received on 22.05.2012. The Magistrate directed registration of the complaint as PCR and later, on 13.07.2012, without examining the complainant, referred the complaint to the jurisdictional police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for investigation, alleging offences under Sections 323, 324, 420, 409 IPC. The petitioner contended that the Magistrate failed to follow the mandatory procedure under Section 200 Cr.P.C., which requires examination of the complainant on oath before taking cognizance or referring the matter to police. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 2(d) Cr.P.C., which defines a complaint, and Section 200 Cr.P.C., which mandates examination of the complainant. The court held that when a complaint is sent by post, the Magistrate must first examine the complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before proceeding further. Referring the complaint to police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. without such examination is illegal and without jurisdiction. The court quashed the FIR and all proceedings in PCR No.95/2012.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Complaint by Post - Procedure under Section 200 Cr.P.C. - When a written complaint is sent by post to a Magistrate, the Magistrate must first examine the complainant on oath under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before taking any further action, including referring the matter to police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. - The Magistrate's order referring the complaint to police without examining the complainant is illegal and without jurisdiction - Held that the proceedings initiated on such a complaint are liable to be quashed (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

What is the procedure to be followed when a complaint in writing is sent to the Magistrate through post?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The FIR in Crime No.86/2012 and all proceedings in PCR No.95/2012 pending on the file of the Prl. C.J. and J.M.F.C., Chickballapura are quashed.

Law Points

  • Procedure for complaint sent by post
  • Magistrate must examine complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before referring to police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
  • Complaint not filed in person cannot be treated as a complaint under Section 2(d) Cr.P.C. without examination
  • Order under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. without following Section 200 Cr.P.C. is illegal and liable to be quashed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (04) 26

Criminal Petition No.5866 of 2013

2019-04-16

John Michael Cunha

Vivek Subbareddy, Shaik Ismail Zabiulla, I.S.Pramod Chandra

Yakoob Sharief

The State of Karnataka, Gopalappa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR and proceedings in a private complaint

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR in Crime No.86/2012 and proceedings in PCR No.95/2012

Filing Reason

The Magistrate referred the complaint to police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. without examining the complainant as required under Section 200 Cr.P.C.

Issues

Whether a Magistrate can refer a complaint sent by post to police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. without examining the complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner argued that the Magistrate failed to follow the mandatory procedure under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before referring the complaint to police, rendering the proceedings illegal.

Ratio Decidendi

When a complaint is sent by post to a Magistrate, the Magistrate must first examine the complainant on oath under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before taking any further action, including referring the matter to police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Failure to do so renders the proceedings illegal and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

What is the procedure to be followed when a complaint in writing is sent to the Magistrate through post? is the question that arises for consideration in this petition. The learned Magistrate directed Registry to register the said complaint as PCR. By a subsequent order dated 13.07.2012, the learned Magistrate referred the complaint to the Jurisdictional police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C for investigation. The contention of learned Senior counsel for the petitioner/accused is that on receipt of the complaint, the learned Magistrate ought to have examined the complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before referring the matter to the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

Procedural History

The second respondent sent a written complaint by registered post to the JMFC, Chickballapura, received on 22.05.2012. The Magistrate directed registration as PCR on 22.05.2012. On 13.07.2012, the Magistrate referred the complaint to police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.5866 of 2013 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR and proceedings. The High Court allowed the petition on 16.04.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 2(d), 156(3), 200, 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 323, 324, 420, 409
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Proceedings in PCR Complaint Sent by Post — Magistrate Failed to Follow Procedure Under Section 200 Cr.P.C. Before Referring to Police Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Complaint sent by post requires examination ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Remand Order in Right of Way Dispute Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Court upholds Additional Collector's order remitting matter for fresh enquiry as Tahsildar's order was passed without pro...