Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Instructor Candidate in Fitter Trade — Equivalence of Modular Certificates Recognized. State's Circulars Treating Modular Training as Equivalent to National Trade Certificate Bind the State for Recruitment.

  • 18
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Rajesh Kumar Dwivedi, applied for the post of Instructor in Fitter trade pursuant to an advertisement dated 17.03.2008 issued by the Directorate of Training and Employment, Lucknow, U.P. The prescribed educational qualification was a certificate in the concerned trade from the National Council of Vocational Training (NCVT) plus two years' experience. The appellant possessed three certificates from Model Industrial Training Institute (MITI), Haldwani: (a) National Trade Certificate of basic training of one year in Mechanical Group (Sept. 1990 to Aug. 1991); (b) National Trade Certificate of further training of six months in Fitter General (Sept. 1991 to Feb. 1992); and (c) National Trade Certificate of further training of six months in Metrology and Engineering Inspection (Mar. 1992 to Aug. 1992). The appellant's candidature was rejected on the ground that he did not possess a two-year course from NCVT. The High Court of Allahabad dismissed his writ petition and appeal, holding that three different courses cannot be treated as equivalent to the prescribed qualification. The appellant relied on a Circular dated 16.12.1983 of the Ministry of Labour & Rehabilitation, Government of India, which declared that a candidate having the basic course in Mechanical Trade (one year), Fitting General Module (six months), and Metrology and Engineering Inspection Module (six months) is treated as equivalent to Fitter of two years training. Further, the State Government issued Circulars on 18.08.1988 and 09.04.1992 directing that certificates from MITI, Haldwani (including modular training) be treated as equivalent to National Trade Certificate for services and posts under the State Government. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the State's stand rejecting the appellant's candidature was not tenable. The Court observed that the eligibility condition under Rule 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Training Institutes (Instructors) Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2003 only requires a certificate in the respective trade from NCVT, and it is not necessary that the qualification be in one certificate. The State's own Circulars treat the modular certificates as equivalent, and the State cannot take a contrary stand. The Court directed the State Government to take proper steps for appointment of the appellant in accordance with law within two months.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Educational Qualification - Equivalence of Certificates - The appellant possessed three modular certificates (basic course in Mechanical Group, Fitting General Module, Metrology and Engineering Inspection Module) from MITI, Haldwani. The State Government's Circulars dated 18.08.1988 and 09.04.1992 treated such modular training as equivalent to National Trade Certificate in Fitter trade. The Court held that the State cannot reject the appellant's candidature on the ground that he does not possess a single certificate, as the Circulars bind the State and the qualification is deemed equivalent. (Paras 9-10)

B) Service Law - Recruitment - Binding Effect of Government Circulars - The State Government issued Circulars on 18.08.1988 and 09.04.1992 declaring that certificates from MITI, Haldwani (including modular training) shall be treated equivalent to National Trade Certificate. The Court held that once the State itself has treated the qualification as equivalent, it cannot take a contrary stand while considering eligibility for recruitment. The Circulars have full effect and no amendment to the Rules is required for their applicability. (Paras 9-10)

C) Service Law - Interpretation of Service Rules - Rule 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Training Institutes (Instructors) Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2003 requires a candidate to possess a certificate in the respective trade from NCVT. The Court held that it is not necessary that the qualification be possessed in one certificate; modular certificates collectively treated as equivalent satisfy the requirement. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's modular training certificates from MITI, Haldwani (one year basic course in Mechanical Group, six months Fitting General Module, and six months Metrology and Engineering Inspection Module) are equivalent to a two-year National Trade Certificate in Fitter trade for the purpose of eligibility for the post of Instructor under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Training Institutes (Instructors) Service Rules, 1991, as amended in 2003.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and directed the State Government to take proper steps for appointment of the appellant in accordance with law within two months from the date of receipt of the judgment.

Law Points

  • Equivalence of educational qualifications
  • Binding effect of government circulars
  • Interpretation of service rules
  • Modular training certificates treated as equivalent to National Trade Certificate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (12) 10

Civil Appeal No. 9140 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 7954 of 2017)

2019-12-06

L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta

Rajesh Kumar Dwivedi

State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against the dismissal of writ petition challenging rejection of candidature for the post of Instructor in Fitter trade.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought a declaration that his modular certificates are equivalent to the prescribed qualification and direction for appointment.

Filing Reason

The appellant's candidature for the post of Instructor (Fitter) was rejected on the ground that he did not possess a two-year course from NCVT.

Previous Decisions

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition and the appeal, holding that three different courses cannot be treated as equivalent to the prescribed qualification.

Issues

Whether the appellant's modular training certificates from MITI, Haldwani are equivalent to a two-year National Trade Certificate in Fitter trade for eligibility under the Rules. Whether the State Government's Circulars dated 18.08.1988 and 09.04.1992 treating such modular training as equivalent are binding on the State for recruitment.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Circulars of the Government of India and State Government treat his modular certificates as equivalent to the National Trade Certificate in Fitter trade, and therefore he is eligible. State argued that the Circulars have no effect unless the Rules are amended, and the appellant does not possess the qualification as per Rule 8 of the amended Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The eligibility condition under Rule 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Training Institutes (Instructors) Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2003 requires a certificate in the respective trade from NCVT, but it is not necessary that the qualification be in one certificate. The State Government's Circulars dated 18.08.1988 and 09.04.1992 treat modular certificates from MITI, Haldwani as equivalent to National Trade Certificate, and the State is bound by its own Circulars. Therefore, the appellant's candidature was wrongly rejected.

Judgment Excerpts

We find that the stand of the State that appellant is not possessed of educational qualifications is not tenable. The eligibility condition is that a candidate must have obtained a certificate in respective trade from NCVT. It is not necessary that a qualification prescribed in the Rules has to be possessed in one certificate. Once the educational qualification has been treated to be equivalent by the State Government in the Circulars issued earlier, the stand of the State that appellant is not qualified has no legs to stand.

Procedural History

The appellant applied for the post of Instructor (Fitter) in response to an advertisement dated 17.03.2008. His candidature was rejected. He filed a writ petition before the High Court of Allahabad, which was dismissed on 26.04.2011. He filed an appeal, which was dismissed on 14.12.2016. He then filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, which was converted into Civil Appeal No. 9140 of 2019 and allowed on 06.12.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Uttar Pradesh Industrial Training Institutes (Instructors) Service Rules, 1991: Rule 8
  • Uttar Pradesh Industrial Training Institutes (Instructors) Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2003: Rule 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Instructor Candidate in Fitter Trade — Equivalence of Modular Certificates Recognized. State's Circulars Treating Modular Training as Equivalent to National Trade Certificate Bind the State for Recruitment.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Examines Limitation Period for Execution Proceedings Under Limitation Act, 1963 - Appeal Challenges High Court's Dismissal of Revision Petition on Grounds of Time-Barred Execution Application. Court Considers Whether Limitation Period S...