High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notice for Co-operative Society Due to Appointment of Untrained Returning Officer. Appointment of a Second Division Clerk from Education Department as Returning Officer for election to President and Vice President of a Women's Milk Producers Co-operative Society held invalid for lack of training and authority under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Ramani S Kunder, a member of the Mattu Milk Producers Women's Co-operative Society, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the notice of election dated 7.2.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent, the Election Returning Officer. The election was for the posts of President and Vice President of the society for the term 2019-2024. The 2nd respondent, the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and District Co-operative Election Officer, had appointed one Sanjay S, a Second Division Clerk in the Public Instruction Department, as the Returning Officer. The petitioner contended that Sanjay S was not trained in election procedures and that his appointment was invalid. The court observed that there was nothing on record to show that Sanjay S was trained in conducting elections. The court held that the appointment of an untrained person as Returning Officer is not sustainable and quashed the election notice. The court directed the respondents to appoint a proper Returning Officer in accordance with the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and the Rules framed thereunder.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Election of Office Bearers - Appointment of Returning Officer - Sections 28A, 29A of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - The petitioner challenged the notice of election dated 7.2.2019 issued by the Returning Officer, who was a Second Division Clerk in the Public Instruction Department, on the ground that he was not trained in election procedures. The court held that the appointment of an untrained person as Returning Officer is not sustainable and quashed the election notice. (Paras 1-4)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India - The High Court exercised its writ jurisdiction to quash the election notice issued by an improperly appointed Returning Officer, emphasizing that the election process must be conducted by a person with proper training and authority. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointment of a Second Division Clerk from the Public Instruction Department as Returning Officer for the election to the post of President and Vice President of a Co-operative Society is valid under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and the Rules framed thereunder.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The notice dated 7.2.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent is quashed. The respondents are directed to appoint a proper Returning Officer in accordance with the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and the Rules framed thereunder.

Law Points

  • Appointment of Returning Officer must be from trained personnel
  • Election process must comply with statutory requirements
  • Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (02) 23

Writ Petition No.8020/2019 (CS-EL/M)

2019-02-22

S.N. Satyanarayana

Dr. S. Arumugham for petitioner, Sri A.K. Vasanth for respondents 1 to 3

Mrs. Ramani S Kunder

The Department of Co-operative Societies, The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and District Co-operative Election Officer, The Election Returning Officer, The Mattu Milk Producers Women's Co-operative Society

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging election notice for co-operative society

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 7.2.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent (Election Returning Officer)

Filing Reason

Appointment of untrained person as Returning Officer for election to posts of President and Vice President of the society

Issues

Whether the appointment of a Second Division Clerk from the Public Instruction Department as Returning Officer for the election to the post of President and Vice President of a Co-operative Society is valid under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and the Rules framed thereunder.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Returning Officer, Sanjay S, was not trained in election procedures and his appointment was invalid. Respondents did not file any counter or appear to contest the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The appointment of an untrained person as Returning Officer for election to the posts of President and Vice President of a co-operative society is not sustainable. The election process must be conducted by a person with proper training and authority under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

Judgment Excerpts

In fact, there is nothing on record to show that said person is trained in the procedure of conducting election. The appointment of an untrained person as Returning Officer is not sustainable.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the election notice dated 7.2.2019. The court heard the matter and passed the order on 22.2.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959: 28A, 29A
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notice for Co-operative Society Due to Appointment of Untrained Returning Officer. Appointment of a Second Division Clerk from Education Department as Returning Officer for election to President and Vice Presi...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Dispute over property sale agreement held to be purely contractual, not constituting criminal offence under Section 420 IPC.