High Court of Karnataka Allows Withdrawal of Petition Challenging Circular on School Guidelines. Petitioner sought mandamus against framing of guidelines under impugned circular dated 11.6.2020 but withdrew petition without merits adjudication.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 25
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Geetha K.N., Principal of Airaa Academy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petition sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, the State of Karnataka and its departments, not to proceed with framing guidelines pursuant to an impugned circular dated 11.6.2020 (Annexure-A). The matter came up for preliminary hearing through video conferencing on 6th July 2020 before a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Nataraj Rangaswamy. At the hearing, the counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No reasons were given for the withdrawal, and the court did not adjudicate on the merits of the case. The order was signed by the Chief Justice and the Judge.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Withdrawal of Petition - Petitioner sought writ of mandamus against framing of guidelines under impugned circular - Court permitted withdrawal and disposed petition as withdrawn - No merits adjudicated (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010187322020_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition was disposed of as withdrawn upon the request of the petitioner's counsel.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of petition
  • No adjudication on merits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 152

Writ Petition No. 8460 of 2020 (EDN-RES)

2020-07-06

Abhay S. Oka, Nataraj Rangaswamy

Shri N. Goutham Raghunath (for petitioner), Shri Prabhulinga K. Navadgi, Advocate General with Shri Vikram Huilgol, AGA (for respondents)

Mrs. Geetha K.N.

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a circular dated 11.6.2020 regarding framing of guidelines.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents not to proceed with framing guidelines under the impugned circular.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the circular dated 11.6.2020 issued by the State of Karnataka.

Ratio Decidendi

Not mentioned as the petition was withdrawn without adjudication.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. It came up for preliminary hearing through video conferencing on 6th July 2020, and the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Adverse Possession.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent