Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case — Injury Not Dangerous to Life. No Prima Facie Case Under Section 307 IPC as Injury Was a Cut on Left Hand, Not Life-Threatening.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 76
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sanaulla @ Sana, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.40/2020 registered at Krishnaraja Police Station, Mysuru, for offences punishable under Sections 324, 307, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The complaint was lodged by Sri Sameer Pasha on 11.03.2020, alleging that on 10.03.2020 at 4.00 PM, the complainant and his brother Umer had parked their autorickshaw for hire at a prepaid auto stand when the petitioner and others attacked them with a knife, causing injuries. The petitioner had previously filed an application for anticipatory bail before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru, which was dismissed on 01.06.2020. The High Court heard the matter through video conference. The court examined the substance of the complaint and the order of the Sessions Court. The court noted that the injury sustained by the complainant was a cut injury on the left hand and was not dangerous to life. The court observed that no prima facie case under Section 307 IPC was made out as the injury was not life-threatening. The court also considered that the petitioner was an auto driver and there was no likelihood of his absconding or tampering with evidence. The court held that custodial interrogation was not required and granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions. The decision was in favor of the accused/petitioner.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 CrPC - Prima Facie Case - The court considered whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail in a case involving attempt to murder. The court held that the injury caused was not dangerous to life and no prima facie case under Section 307 IPC was made out, thus bail was granted (Paras 8-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 324, 307, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted anticipatory bail in Crime No.40/2020 of Krishnaraja Police Station, Mysuru, for offences under Sections 324, 307, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC, subject to conditions.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 307 IPC
  • prima facie case
  • injury not dangerous to life
  • custodial interrogation not required
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 126

Criminal Petition No.2895/2020

2020-07-03

N.K. Sudhindrarao

Sri Chandrashekara K.A. for petitioner, Sri K. Nageshwarappa (HCGP) for respondent

Sanaulla @ Sana

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought enlargement on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.40/2020.

Filing Reason

Petitioner apprehended arrest in connection with offences under Sections 324, 307, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner's earlier application for anticipatory bail (C.Crl.Mis.No.522/2020) was dismissed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru on 01.06.2020.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 324, 307, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the injury was not dangerous to life and no prima facie case under Section 307 IPC was made out. Respondent's HCGP opposed the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi

Anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. when the injury caused is not dangerous to life and no prima facie case under Section 307 IPC is made out, and custodial interrogation is not required.

Judgment Excerpts

The injury sustained by the complainant is a cut injury on the left hand and it is not dangerous to life. No prima facie case under Section 307 IPC is made out. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required.

Procedural History

Complaint filed on 11.03.2020. Petitioner filed anticipatory bail application before Sessions Court (C.Crl.Mis.No.522/2020) which was dismissed on 01.06.2020. Thereafter, petitioner filed the present petition before High Court on 03.07.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 438
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 324, 307, 504, 506, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction order under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 must show application of mind and failure to do so vitiates prosecution.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Contempt Finding in Panchayat Proceedings Due to Insufficient Proof of Knowledge of Stay Order. Contempt Finding Set Aside as Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Was Not Satisfied; Applicant Failed to Provide...