High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Wine Shop Owner in Excise Act Case Due to Age and Non-Custodial Nature of Offences. Petitioner, aged 75 years, allowed anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 21(1), 32, 36 of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 and Rule 21(3) of Karnataka Excise Licence (General Conditions) Rules, 1967, as custodial interrogation not required and maximum punishment is five years.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 89
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri Venkatachalaiah K V, aged about 73 years, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.60/2019-20 registered by the Excise Police, C.N. Halli, Tumakuru, for offences punishable under Sections 21(1), 32, and 36 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 and Rule 21(3) of the Karnataka Excise Licence (General Conditions) Rules, 1967. The prosecution case was that despite the Excise Authorities sealing the petitioner's wine shop, he permitted entry of two persons into the shop, and there was a difference in the quantity of liquor stored and declared in the account books. The petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner was aged about 75 years and had no role in the alleged offences. The court noted that the offences alleged are punishable with a maximum imprisonment of up to five years, and the petitioner is aged about 75 years. The court held that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required for investigation, and the offences are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life. Therefore, the court allowed the petition and granted anticipatory bail, directing that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon executing a personal bond for Rs.1,00,000 with one surety, and subject to conditions including appearing before the Investigating Officer as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without prior permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 Cr.P.C. - Grant of Bail - Petitioner, aged 75 years, sought anticipatory bail for offences under Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 punishable with up to five years imprisonment - Court considered age, non-requirement of custodial interrogation, and that offences are not punishable with death or life imprisonment - Held that petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail subject to conditions (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, aged about 75 years, is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, punishable with imprisonment up to five years, where the allegations involve sealing of a wine shop and discrepancy in liquor stock.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. In the event of arrest of the petitioner in Crime No.60/2019-20, he shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for Rs.1,00,000 with one surety for the like sum, subject to conditions: (i) petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) petitioner shall not tamper with evidence; (iii) petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the court without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
  • Karnataka Excise Act
  • 1965
  • Sections 21(1)
  • 32
  • 36
  • Rule 21(3) of Karnataka Excise Licence (General Conditions) Rules
  • 1967
  • maximum punishment up to five years
  • no custodial interrogation required
  • petitioner aged 75 years
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 117

Criminal Petition No.2970 of 2020

2020-07-09

Justice John Michael Cunha

Smt. D. Sudha for Sri G K Bhat (for petitioner), Smt. K.P. Yashodha (HCGP for respondent)

Sri Venkatachalaiah K V

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought an order of anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.60/2019-20.

Filing Reason

Petitioner apprehended arrest in connection with offences under Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 and Rules for allegedly permitting entry of persons into a sealed wine shop and discrepancy in liquor stock.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences punishable with imprisonment up to five years under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner is aged about 75 years and had no role in the alleged offences. State opposed the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi

Anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. when the offences alleged are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and custodial interrogation is not required for investigation, especially considering the age of the accused.

Judgment Excerpts

The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable with a maximum imprisonment upto five years. Considering the age of the petitioner and the nature of the offences, custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled to the order of anticipatory bail.

Procedural History

FIR was registered on 02.04.2020 in Crime No.60/2019-20 by Excise Police, C.N. Halli, Tumakuru. Petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.2970 of 2020 under Section 438 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka seeking anticipatory bail. The petition was heard and disposed of on 09.07.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 438
  • Karnataka Excise Act, 1965: 21(1), 32, 36
  • Karnataka Excise Licence (General Conditions) Rules, 1967: 21(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Wine Shop Owner in Excise Act Case Due to Age and Non-Custodial Nature of Offences. Petitioner, aged 75 years, allowed anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 21(1), ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Grant Case: Upholds Resumption of Granted Land Under Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978 Despite Delay. The court held that the absence of a limitation period in the Act and the welfare nature of the legislation al...