Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Rape and Cheating Case Based on Consensual Relationship and Lack of Coercion. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC as the relationship was consensual and the investigation was complete.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Abilash Shalum @ Rai Abhilash Bramhaiah, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Crime No.235/2019 registered at Suddaguntepalya Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Sections 417 (cheating), 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 376(1)(n) (rape by a person in a position of trust or authority) and 313 (causing miscarriage without consent) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The case was pending in C.C.No.5699/2020 before the VI Additional CMM, Bengaluru. The prosecution's case was that the defacto complainant filed a complaint on 15th December 2019 alleging that the petitioner cheated her and had sexual intercourse with her on multiple occasions by promising to marry her. The petitioner argued that the relationship was consensual and that he had not been arrested during the investigation. The court noted that the allegations did not indicate forcible sexual assault and that the investigation was complete. Considering the nature of the relationship and the stage of proceedings, the court allowed the petition and granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Offences under Sections 417, 420, 376(1)(n) and 313 IPC - Petitioner sought bail in Crime No.235/2019 for alleged cheating and rape on promise to marry - Court considered that the relationship was consensual over a period and the petitioner had not been arrested during investigation - Held that the petitioner is entitled to bail as the allegations do not indicate forcible sexual assault and the investigation is complete (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 417, 420, 376(1)(n) and 313 IPC, considering the nature of the relationship and the stage of investigation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.235/2019 (C.C.No.5699/2020) of Suddaguntepalya Police Station, Bengaluru, subject to conditions.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Rape
  • Cheating
  • Consensual Relationship
  • Promise to Marry
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • Section 376(1)(n) IPC
  • Section 417 IPC
  • Section 420 IPC
  • Section 313 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 111

Criminal Petition No.2892 of 2020

2020-07-08

Suraj Govindaraj

K.A. Chandrashekara (for petitioner), K.P. Yashodha (HCGP for respondent)

Abilash Shalum @ Rai Abhilash Bramhaiah

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement on bail in Crime No.235/2019

Filing Reason

Petitioner was accused of cheating and rape on promise to marry

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 417, 420, 376(1)(n) and 313 IPC

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the relationship was consensual and he had not been arrested during investigation. Prosecution opposed bail citing the seriousness of the offences.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the allegations do not indicate forcible sexual assault and the relationship was consensual over a period. Since the investigation is complete and the petitioner had not been arrested, bail is granted under Section 439 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for enlarging him on bail in Crime No.235/2019 of Suddaguntepalya Police Station, Bengaluru City now pending in C.C.No.5699/2020 on the file of VI Additional CMM., Bengaluru for the offence punishable under Sections 417, 420, 376(1)(n) and 313 of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant had filed a complaint on 15th December 2019 stating that the petitioner had cheated her and had sexual intercourse with her on multiple occasions by promising to marry her.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 439 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka seeking bail in Crime No.235/2019 registered at Suddaguntepalya Police Station. The case was pending in C.C.No.5699/2020 before the VI Additional CMM, Bengaluru. The court heard the petition and passed the order on 8th July 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 417, 420, 376(1)(n), 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against SEBI Order Declaring Art Funds as Collective Investment Schemes. Trusts managing pooled investments in art works held to be Collective Investment Schemes under SEBI Act, 1992, despite being structured as trusts ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition by Corporation of the City of Panaji Challenging Compensation Award Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in the Award and Scope of Judicial...