High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Representation for Deferment of Transfer on Medical Grounds in CRPF Transfer Matter. Petitioner's challenge to transfer order given up; court orders time-bound consideration of representation seeking deferment on medical and humanitarian grounds.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shiv Kumar Singh, a Deputy Inspector General of Police in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a transfer order dated 02.06.2020 and an office order dated 17.06.2020. However, during the preliminary hearing, the petitioner's counsel gave up the challenge to the transfer order itself, confining the grievance to the non-consideration of a representation dated 16.06.2020 (Annexure-F) wherein the petitioner sought deferment of being relieved on transfer for six months on medical and humanitarian grounds. The respondents, represented by the learned Assistant Solicitor General, resisted the petition but fairly stated that if a reasonable period was prescribed by the court, there would be no difficulty in considering the representation in a time-bound manner. The court, noting the limited scope of the grievance and the concession by the respondents, disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.06.2020 in accordance with law within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the representation.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Representation - Medical Grounds - Petitioner, a Deputy Inspector General of CRPF, challenged transfer order but gave up challenge to transfer, limiting grievance to non-consideration of representation seeking deferment of relieving on medical and humanitarian grounds - Court directed respondents to consider representation within two weeks, as ASG conceded no difficulty if reasonable period prescribed - Held that representation must be considered in accordance with law (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner's representation seeking deferment of transfer on medical and humanitarian grounds should be considered by the respondents.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition disposed of with direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 16.06.2020 in accordance with law within two weeks from receipt of copy of order. No opinion on merits of representation.

Law Points

  • Transfer order
  • representation
  • medical grounds
  • humanitarian grounds
  • time-bound consideration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 104

Writ Petition No. 8310 of 2020 (S-TR)

2020-07-02

Justice Krishna S. Dixit

Sri. Muralidhar for Sri. Srinivasa K (for petitioner), Sri. C Shashikanta, ASG (for respondents)

Shiv Kumar Singh

The Director General, Central Reserve Police, New Delhi and The Inspector General of Police, Karnataka-Kerala Sector, CRPF, Bengaluru

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging transfer order and seeking consideration of representation for deferment of transfer.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of transfer order dated 02.06.2020 and office order dated 17.06.2020, and direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 16.06.2020.

Filing Reason

Non-consideration of petitioner's representation seeking deferment of transfer on medical and humanitarian grounds.

Issues

Whether the respondents should consider the petitioner's representation seeking deferment of transfer on medical and humanitarian grounds.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel gave up challenge to transfer order, limiting grievance to non-consideration of representation. Respondents' ASG stated no difficulty in considering representation if reasonable period prescribed by court.

Ratio Decidendi

When a representation is made on medical and humanitarian grounds seeking deferment of transfer, the authority must consider it in accordance with law within a reasonable time, especially when the challenge to the transfer order itself is given up.

Judgment Excerpts

The short remainder of grievance of the petitioner... is against the non-consideration of his representation dated 16.06.2020... wherein he has sought for deferment of being relieved on transfer, for a period of six months on medical and humanitarian grounds. Shri C Shashikantha... fairly states that if a reasonable period is prescribed by this Court, there would be no difficulty for considering the subject representation in a time bound manner and in accordance with law.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed on unknown date; came up for preliminary hearing on 02.07.2020; disposed of on same date.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Representation for Deferment of Transfer on Medical Grounds in CRPF Transfer Matter. Petitioner's challenge to transfer order given up; court orders time-bound consideration of representation seeking d...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Grievous Hurt and Unlawful Restraint in Midnight Shooting Incident. Accused's Claim of Private Defence Rejected as Disproportionate and Unsubstantiated.