High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Ex-Serviceman's Land Grant Representation Under Military Quota. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Respondents to Decide Representations Within Three Months.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 110
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, A.N. Seenappa, an ex-serviceman who served 21 years in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and retired on 01.07.2013, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. He sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents, including the State of Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, and Tahasildar, to consider his representations dated 29.08.2018 (Annexure-A) and 12.06.2018 (Annexure-B) for grant of land bearing Sy. No.157 measuring 4 acres 38 guntas of Arakere village, Yaladuru Hobli, Srinivasapura Taluk, under the Military Ex-servicemen quota. The petitioner had initially applied to the DIG, Group Centre, CRPF, Yelahanka, Bengaluru, which forwarded his application to the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar District. However, no action was taken on his subsequent representations. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that despite the forwarding, the respondents failed to consider the representations. The High Court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondents, disposed of the petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The court did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Consideration of Representation - Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India - Petitioner, an ex-serviceman, sought a writ of mandamus to direct respondents to consider his representations for grant of land under the Military Ex-servicemen quota - Court held that the respondents are directed to consider the representations and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents are obligated to consider the petitioner's representations for grant of land under the Military Ex-servicemen quota.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations dated 29.08.2018 (Annexure-A) and 12.06.2018 (Annexure-B) and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Writ of mandamus
  • Consideration of representation
  • Ex-serviceman quota
  • Land grant
  • Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 47

W.P.No.5338/2020

2020-07-10

S. Vishwajith Shetty

Sri Chokkareddy (for petitioner), Smt. Savithramma, HCGP (for respondents)

A.N. Seenappa

State of Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Tahasildar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to consider representations for grant of land under Military Ex-servicemen quota.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to consider his representations dated 29.08.2018 and 12.06.2018 for grant of land.

Filing Reason

Respondents failed to consider the petitioner's representations for grant of land under the Military Ex-servicemen quota.

Issues

Whether the respondents are obligated to consider the petitioner's representations for grant of land under the Military Ex-servicemen quota.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner retired from CRPF on 01.07.2013 and made a request to the DIG, CRPF, which forwarded the application to the Deputy Commissioner, but no action was taken on subsequent representations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three months, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner who claims to be an Ex-serviceman having served for a period of 21 years in Central Reserve Police Force, has approached this Court seeking writ of mandamus to consider his representation dated 29.08.2018 at Annexure-A submitted by him to respondent no.2 and the representation dated 12.06.2018 at Annexure-B submitted by him to respondent no.4, for grant of land bearing Sy. No.157 measuring 4 acres 38 guntas of Arakere village, Yaladuru Hobli, Srinivasapura Taluk, under Military Ex-serviceman quota.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on an unspecified date. The petition was heard on 10.07.2020 and disposed of on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Ex-Serviceman's Land Grant Representation Under Military Quota. Writ of Mandamus Issued to Respondents to Decide Representations Within Three Months.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Beedi Workers Act Case — Sale of Beedis Not Manufacturing Process. Employee Fails to Establish Employer's Engagement in Manufacturing Process Under Section 2(k) of Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions ...