High Court of Karnataka Allows Withdrawal of Bail Petition in POCSO Case with Liberty to Approach Trial Court. Petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal after arguments, and court directed trial court to consider any fresh bail application expeditiously.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, N. Narasimha Murthy, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No. 66/2019 (Spl.C.No.313/2019) registered at Vishwanathapura Police Station, Bengaluru City, for offences punishable under Sections 366, 342, 376, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. After arguing the matter for considerable length of time, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, reserving liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate application before the trial court for his release on bail. The High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice John Michael Cunha, allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition. The court directed that if such an application is filed, the trial court shall consider it as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. The order was passed on July 6, 2020, via video conference.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Withdrawal of Petition - Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under IPC and POCSO Act - Counsel sought leave to withdraw petition with liberty to approach trial court - Court allowed withdrawal and directed trial court to consider any fresh bail application expeditiously - Held that the petition is disposed of with liberty to approach trial court (Para 1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in a case involving offences under Sections 366, 342, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 6 of POCSO Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to petitioner to approach trial court for bail; trial court directed to consider any such application expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Withdrawal of petition
  • Liberty to approach trial court
  • Expeditious disposal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 28

Criminal Petition No.1970/2020

2020-07-06

John Michael Cunha

Sri V. Anand (for petitioner), Sri Thejesh P., HCGP (for respondent 1)

N. Narasimha Murthy

State of Karnataka, Jyothamma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Enlargement of petitioner on bail in Crime No.66/2019 for offences under IPC and POCSO Act.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested and sought bail.

Issues

Whether the petitioner should be granted bail.

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for petitioner sought leave to withdraw petition with liberty to approach trial court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court allowed withdrawal of the bail petition and directed the trial court to consider any fresh bail application expeditiously, without expressing any opinion on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

After arguing the matter for considerable length of time, learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to make appropriate application before the trial Court for his release on bail. In such event, the trail Court shall consider the said application as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.1970/2020 under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail in Crime No.66/2019 (Spl.C.No.313/2019) of Vishwanathapura P.S., Bengaluru City. After arguments, counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to approach trial court. Court allowed withdrawal and disposed of petition on July 6, 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 366, 342, 376, 506
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: 4, 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Accident Insurance Claim for Heart Attack Following Motorcycle Fall — 'Outward, Violent and Visible Means' Includes External Trauma Triggering Internal Injury. The Court held that a fall from a motorcycle constitutes an acciden...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Withdrawal of Bail Petition in POCSO Case with Liberty to Approach Trial Court. Petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal after arguments, and court directed trial court to consider any fresh bail application expeditiously...