High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Ingredients of Offence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Court Held That Mere Issuance of Cheque Without Existing Liability Does Not Attract Offence Under Section 138 NI Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 60
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were employees of Bagalkot Cement and Industries Limited, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.86/2016 registered at Udupi Town Police Station for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The FIR was lodged by the second respondent, Dr. Umesh Prabhu, Chairman and Managing Director of Gukul Super Speciality Hospital Pvt. Ltd., alleging that a cheque issued by the petitioners was dishonoured. The petitioners contended that the cheque was not issued towards any existing liability and that the complaint was an abuse of process. The court examined the allegations in the FIR and found that the essential ingredients of Section 138 NI Act, particularly the existence of a legally enforceable debt or liability, were not made out. The court held that mere issuance of a cheque without any underlying liability does not attract the offence. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR to prevent abuse of the court process.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Abuse of process of court - FIR under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Cheque issued without existing liability - Held that where the allegations in the FIR do not disclose the essential ingredients of the offence, the High Court can exercise inherent powers to quash the proceedings to prevent abuse of process (Paras 5-10).

B) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Dishonour of Cheque - Ingredients - Existing liability - The offence under Section 138 requires that the cheque was issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability - In the absence of any such liability, the prosecution is not maintainable - Held that the FIR did not disclose any existing liability and hence liable to be quashed (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be quashed when the cheque was issued without any existing liability and the complainant failed to show legally enforceable debt.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The FIR in Cr.No.86/2016 registered by Udupi Town Police Station pending on the file of Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Udupi is quashed.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881
  • Ingredients of offence
  • Existing liability
  • Cheque dishonour
  • Criminal proceedings abuse of process
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (KAR) (02) 42

Criminal Petition No.2876/2016

2021-02-06

K.Somashekar

Ashok Haranahalli, S.B.Hebbali, Rashmi Jadhav, Biju B, Mamatha Shetty

R.C.Sodani, Rajprasad M, Mallikarjun B Mathad

The State, Dr. Umesh Prabhu

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of FIR in Cr.No.86/2016 registered by Udupi Town Police Station for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the FIR was based on a cheque issued without any existing liability and was an abuse of process of court

Issues

Whether the FIR under Section 138 NI Act can be quashed when the cheque was issued without any existing liability? Whether the continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to abuse of process of court?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the cheque was not issued towards any legally enforceable debt or liability and the FIR lacked essential ingredients of Section 138 NI Act. Respondent-State argued that the FIR disclosed a prima facie case and the petition should be dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi

The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires that the cheque was issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability. In the absence of any such liability, the prosecution is not maintainable and the FIR is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard the arguments of the learned Senior Counsel for petitioner and HCGP for State and perused the entire materials placed on record. This petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the FIR in Cr.No.86/2016 of Udupi Town Police Station, Udupi pending on the file of Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Udupi.

Procedural History

The FIR was registered on a complaint by Dr. Umesh Prabhu. The petitioners filed this petition under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court seeking quashing of the FIR. The court heard arguments and allowed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986: 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Head Operators Against Pay Scale Reduction Following Abolition of Ultra Vires Intermediate Post. Restoration of Pre-Revised Equivalent Pay Scales Upheld as Consistent with Law.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Ingredients of Offence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Court Held That Mere Issuance of Cheque Without Existing Liability Does Not Attract Offence Unde...