High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Involving Commercial Quantity of Drugs. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail with Conditions as Investigation Complete and Charge Sheet Filed.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 58
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mohmed Ali Tojari, was the sole accused in Crime No.341/2020 registered at Kadugondanahalli Police Station, Bengaluru, for an offence punishable under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The prosecution alleged that on 26.10.2020 at 9.00 p.m., the Police Inspector of CCB received credible information that the petitioner was illegally procuring LSD strips, MDMA crystal, and ecstasy tablets from foreign countries and selling them to students and customers. A raid was conducted at his residence, and contraband was seized. The petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking bail. The court heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned SPP-II for the respondent/State. The court noted that the investigation was complete and the charge sheet had been filed. Considering that no further custodial interrogation was required, the court allowed the petition and granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions, including executing a personal bond of Rs.2,00,000 with two sureties, surrendering his passport, and appearing before the court as directed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Bail - Section 439 Cr.P.C. - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 22(c) - Commercial Quantity - Petitioner/accused sought bail in Crime No.341/2020 for offence under Section 22(c) of NDPS Act - Court considered the rigour of Section 37 of NDPS Act and held that since the investigation was complete and charge sheet filed, no further custodial interrogation was required - Bail granted subject to conditions (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner/accused is entitled to be enlarged on bail in a case registered under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act, 1985, involving commercial quantity of contraband.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.341/2020 of Kadugondanahalli Police Station, subject to conditions: (i) executing a personal bond of Rs.2,00,000 with two sureties; (ii) surrendering his passport; (iii) appearing before the court as directed; (iv) not tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
  • NDPS Act Section 22(c)
  • Commercial quantity
  • Rigour of Section 37 NDPS Act
  • Prima facie case
  • Custodial interrogation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (KAR) (02) 38

Criminal Petition No.7386 of 2020

2021-02-06

Mohammad Nawaz

Sri. Hashmath Pasha (Senior Counsel for Sri. Nasir Ali, Advocate) for Petitioner; Sri. V.S. Hegde SPP-II along with Sri. Divakar M. Maddur, HCGP for Respondent

Sri. Mohmed Ali Tojari

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Enlargement of the petitioner on bail in Crime No.341/2020

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested for alleged offence under Section 22(c) of NDPS Act and sought bail

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case under Section 22(c) of NDPS Act involving commercial quantity?

Submissions/Arguments

Learned senior counsel for petitioner argued for bail. Learned SPP-II for respondent/State opposed the bail.

Ratio Decidendi

Since the investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed, no further custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. Hence, the rigour of Section 37 of NDPS Act is not an absolute bar to grant of bail.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by the sole accused in Crime No.341/2020 of Kadugondanahalli Police Station, Bengaluru City, registered for offence punishable under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Heard the learned senior counsel for petitioner and the learned SPP-II for respondent/State and perused the material on record. The case of the prosecution is that, on 26.10.2020 at 9.00 p.m., the Police Inspector attached to CCB received a credible information that one person by name Mohmed Ali Tojari i.e., petitioner herein, a resident of premises bearing No.673, T.J. Residency, 1st main, 6th cross, V block, HBR Layout, Bengaluru, is illegally earning money procuring LSD strips, MDMA crystal, ecstasy tablets from foreign countries and selling the same to students and customers.

Procedural History

The petitioner was arrested in Crime No.341/2020 registered on 26.10.2020 for offence under Section 22(c) of NDPS Act. He filed Criminal Petition No.7386 of 2020 under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail. The petition was heard and disposed of on 06.02.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 22(c)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration — Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration Lacked Corroboration and Suffered from Material Contradictions
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Involving Commercial Quantity of Drugs. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail with Conditions as Investigation Complete and Charge Sheet Filed.