High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Successive Bail Petition in Murder Case Due to No Change in Circumstances. Accused No.2 charged under Sections 302, 307, 326 read with 149 IPC and Arms Act denied bail as earlier rejection was on merits and no new grounds were shown.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 126
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jiya @ Isubu Shiyad @ Jiyas, filed a successive bail petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, seeking enlargement on bail in Crime No.63/2017 of Ullal Police Station, Mangaluru City. The offences alleged included Sections 120B, 143, 144, 147, 148, 341, 504, 506, 302, 307, 326 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 3, 25(1)(1B), 7, 25(1)(1A) and 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner was accused No.2 in the case. The court noted that the petitioner had earlier filed a bail petition in Crl.P.No.4023/2022, which was rejected on 22.06.2022. In that order, the court had relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Kumer Singh v. State of Rajasthan and Another, 2021 (6) SCJ 227. The present petition was argued by Sri Hasmath Pasha, Senior Counsel for the petitioner, and opposed by Sri K.K. Krishna Kumar, High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. The court observed that a successive bail petition can be entertained only if there is a change in circumstances after the rejection of the earlier petition. Since the earlier petition was rejected on merits and no new grounds were urged, the court found no reason to grant bail. The petition was accordingly dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Successive Bail Petition - Change in Circumstances - Section 439 CrPC - The court held that a successive bail petition can be considered only if there is a change in circumstances after the rejection of the earlier bail petition. Since the earlier petition was rejected on merits and no new grounds were urged, the petition was dismissed. (Paras 3-4)

B) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Murder - Bail - Sections 302, 307, 326 read with 149 IPC - The petitioner was accused No.2 in a case involving murder and attempt to murder. The court noted the seriousness of the offences and the lack of change in circumstances, and declined to grant bail. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner-accused No.2 is entitled to bail in a successive bail petition under Section 439 CrPC when the earlier bail petition was rejected on merits and no change in circumstances is shown.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed.

Law Points

  • Successive bail petition
  • change in circumstances
  • rejection on merits
  • Section 439 CrPC
  • no new grounds
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (11) 73

Criminal Petition No.10549/2022

2022-12-07

H.P. Sandesh

Sri Hasmath Pasha, Sri Kariappa N.A., HP Unique & Co. for petitioner; Sri K.K. Krishna Kumar, HCGP for respondent

Jiya @ Isubu Shiyad @ Jiyas

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement of the petitioner-accused No.2 on bail in Crime No.63/2017 of Ullal Police Station

Filing Reason

The petitioner sought bail after earlier bail petition was rejected on 22.06.2022

Previous Decisions

Earlier bail petition in Crl.P.No.4023/2022 was rejected on 22.06.2022 by the same court relying on Kumer Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a successive bail petition under Section 439 CrPC when the earlier bail petition was rejected on merits and no change in circumstances is shown.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued for bail; the State opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

A successive bail petition can be entertained only if there is a change in circumstances after the rejection of the earlier petition. Since the earlier petition was rejected on merits and no new grounds were urged, the petition is dismissed.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a successive bail petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. Earlier, this petitioner has approached this Court filing the Crl.P.No.4023/2022 and the same was rejected vide order dated 22.06.2022 The only ground urged in this petition is that the earlier petition was rejected on merits and no change in circumstances is shown.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a bail petition in Crl.P.No.4023/2022 which was rejected on 22.06.2022. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the present successive bail petition in Crl.P.No.10549/2022, which was heard and reserved for orders on 24.11.2022 and dismissed on 07.12.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 120B, 143, 144, 147, 148, 341, 504, 506, 302, 307, 326, 149
  • Arms Act, 1959: 3, 25(1)(1B), 7, 25(1)(1A), 27(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Court Orders MSEDCL to Refund Excess Charges to Consumers Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. found in violation of MERC orders; Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum directs refunds with interest.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Successive Bail Petition in Murder Case Due to No Change in Circumstances. Accused No.2 charged under Sections 302, 307, 326 read with 149 IPC and Arms Act denied bail as earlier rejection was on merits and no new gr...