High Court of Karnataka Quashes Adverse Remarks Against Police Inspector in Murder Case — Remarks Made Without Opportunity of Hearing Violate Principles of Natural Justice. Section 482 Cr.P.C. Petition Allowed to Expunge Observations Regarding Investigation Lapses.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 75
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Hanumantharaya, an Inspector of Police, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash/expunge adverse remarks and a direction made by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, in the judgment dated 19.03.2018 in Special Case No.146/2010. The petitioner was appointed as Sub-Inspector of Police on 13.03.2001 and later promoted as Inspector of Police, posted to Chowk Police Station, Gulbarga in 2009. On 04.12.2009, a murder of one Sharanabasappa occurred at about 7:30 p.m. within the jurisdiction of the petitioner's police station. On that date, the petitioner was out of headquarters. The Sessions Judge, while convicting the accused in the murder case, made remarks and a direction against the petitioner regarding the investigation. The petitioner contended that he was not a party to the proceedings and was not given an opportunity of hearing before the remarks were made. The High Court held that the remarks were made without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The court noted that the remarks were not necessary for the disposal of the case and were unwarranted. Relying on the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court allowed the petition and expunged the remarks and direction made by the Sessions Judge against the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of Adverse Remarks - Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Natural Justice - The petitioner, a police inspector, sought expungement of adverse remarks made by the Sessions Judge in a judgment convicting accused in a murder case, where the petitioner was not a party. The High Court held that such remarks, made without giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, are unsustainable and liable to be expunged. The court relied on the principle that no order adverse to a person should be passed without affording him a hearing. (Paras 1-5)

B) Criminal Procedure - Expungement of Remarks - Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The High Court has inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to expunge remarks made by a subordinate court if they are unwarranted and not based on evidence, especially when the person affected was not a party to the proceedings. The court found that the Sessions Judge's remarks regarding the petitioner's investigation were not necessary for the disposal of the case and were made without hearing the petitioner. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the adverse remarks and direction made by the Sessions Judge against the petitioner, who was not a party to the proceedings, can be sustained without affording him an opportunity of hearing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The remarks and direction made by the learned Sessions Judge in the judgment passed in S.C.No.146/2010 dated 19.03.2018 on the file of III Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, against the petitioner are quashed/expunged.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Adverse Remarks
  • Expungement
  • Section 482 Cr.P.C.
  • Opportunity of Hearing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (09) 20

Criminal Petition No.201012/2022

2022-09-29

P.N.Desai

Shri G.V.Chandrashekar, Senior Counsel for Shri Ganesh Naik, Advocate (for petitioner); Shri Veeranagouda Malipatil, HCGP (for respondent)

Mr. Hanumantharaya

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash/expunge adverse remarks and direction made by Sessions Judge in a murder case judgment.

Remedy Sought

Quashing/expunging of remarks and direction made by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in S.C.No.146/2010 dated 19.03.2018.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, a police inspector, was not a party to the murder case but the Sessions Judge made adverse remarks and a direction against him without giving him an opportunity of hearing.

Previous Decisions

The III Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi passed judgment in S.C.No.146/2010 on 19.03.2018 convicting the accused and making remarks/direction against the petitioner.

Issues

Whether the adverse remarks and direction made by the Sessions Judge against the petitioner, who was not a party to the proceedings, can be sustained without affording him an opportunity of hearing.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner contended that he was not a party to the proceedings and was not given an opportunity of hearing before the remarks were made. The petitioner argued that the remarks were unwarranted and not necessary for the disposal of the case.

Ratio Decidendi

Adverse remarks against a person not a party to the proceedings, made without affording him an opportunity of hearing, are unsustainable and liable to be expunged under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as they violate principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.') seeking to quash/expunge the remarks and the direction given in the judgment passed in Special Case No.146/2010 dated 19.03.2018 by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.201012/2022 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, seeking to quash/expunge remarks and direction made by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in S.C.No.146/2010 dated 19.03.2018. The petition was heard and disposed of on 29.09.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Excise Appeal, Upholds Transfer Fee Demand for CL-7 Licence Renewal Under Rule 17B of Karnataka Excise (General Conditions of Licences) Rules, 1967. Induction of Legal Heir of Deceased Partner Constitutes Transfer of Li...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Adverse Remarks Against Police Inspector in Murder Case — Remarks Made Without Opportunity of Hearing Violate Principles of Natural Justice. Section 482 Cr.P.C. Petition Allowed to Expunge Observations Regarding Inve...