High Court of Karnataka Allows Minor Rape Victim to Terminate 28-Week Pregnancy Under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 — Best Interest of Child and Mental Trauma Considered. The court directed the hospital to admit the minor and perform the termination based on expert medical opinion and to prevent mental trauma.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 269
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a 17-year-old minor represented by her father, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the 4th respondent hospital to admit her and terminate her pregnancy. The petitioner was a rape victim and was 28 weeks pregnant. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 generally permits termination up to 20 weeks, and up to 24 weeks under certain conditions. However, the court considered the medical report from a board of doctors which opined that termination was possible and that continuing the pregnancy would cause severe mental trauma to the minor. The court also noted the best interest of the child and the minor's right to health. The court allowed the petition, directing the hospital to admit the petitioner and perform the termination as per the medical board's opinion. The court also directed the State Legal Services Authority to provide legal aid and the Child Welfare Committee to ensure post-termination care.

Headnote

A) Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Gestational Limit - Section 3(2)(b) and Section 5 of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Minor Rape Victim - The petitioner, a 17-year-old minor rape victim, sought termination of her 28-week pregnancy. The court considered the medical report and the best interest of the child, holding that the pregnancy could be terminated to prevent mental trauma to the minor, despite the gestational age exceeding 24 weeks. (Paras 1-10)

B) Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 of Constitution of India - Mandamus - The court exercised its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to direct the hospital to admit the petitioner and perform the termination, as the medical board opined that termination was possible and the minor's mental health was at risk. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a minor rape victim aged 17 years, who is 28 weeks pregnant, can be permitted to terminate her pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, considering the gestational age and the best interest of the child.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, directing the 4th respondent hospital to admit the petitioner and take necessary medical steps to terminate the pregnancy as per the medical board's opinion. The court also directed the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority to provide legal aid and the Child Welfare Committee to ensure post-termination care.

Law Points

  • Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act
  • 1971
  • Section 3(2)(b)
  • Section 5
  • gestational limit
  • minor
  • rape victim
  • best interest of child
  • mental trauma
  • expert medical opinion
  • writ of mandamus
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

NC: 2023:KHC:45180

WP No. 27563 of 2023 (GM-RES)

2023-12-12

Suraj Govindaraj

NC: 2023:KHC:45180

Sri. Prasanna Kumar P. for petitioner; Sri. NaveenChandrashekar for R1, R2, R4 to R6; Smt. Shilpa Rani for R3

Ms.X (minor) represented by father Shri Gopala T

State of Karnataka, Sarjapura Police Station, Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, Vani Villas Women and Children Hospital, Child Welfare Committee, District Child Protection Unit

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to hospital to terminate pregnancy of minor rape victim

Remedy Sought

Direction to 4th respondent hospital to admit petitioner and terminate her pregnancy

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a 17-year-old minor rape victim, was 28 weeks pregnant and sought termination to avoid mental trauma

Issues

Whether the pregnancy of a minor rape victim beyond 24 weeks can be terminated under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Whether the court can issue a writ of mandamus to direct a hospital to perform termination based on medical board opinion

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that continuing pregnancy would cause severe mental trauma to the minor Medical board opined that termination is possible and in the best interest of the minor

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the best interest of the minor and her mental health outweigh the gestational limit under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and that the court can direct termination based on expert medical opinion to prevent trauma.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the 4th respondent/hospital to admit the petitioner and take necessary medical steps to terminate the pregnancy of the petitioner. The medical board opined that termination is possible and that continuing the pregnancy would cause severe mental trauma to the minor.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on an unspecified date. The court heard the matter on 12th December 2023 and passed the order on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971: Section 3(2)(b), Section 5
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Minor Rape Victim to Terminate 28-Week Pregnancy Under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 — Best Interest of Child and Mental Trauma Considered. The court directed the hospital to admit the minor and perform t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and a...