High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Appeal in Divorce Case on Ground of Desertion — Sets Aside Trial Court's Dismissal of Petition. Marriage Dissolved Under Section 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as Wife's Absence for Over 7 Years Constitutes Desertion.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Bhimrao S/o Namdev Savnt, filed a petition under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of his marriage with the respondent, Santoshi W/o Bhimro Savant, on the ground of desertion. The parties were married according to Hindu rites, but the respondent left the matrimonial home in 2010 and did not return despite the appellant's efforts. The appellant, serving in the Army, alleged that the respondent deserted him without reasonable cause. The Trial Court dismissed the petition, leading to the present appeal. The respondent was served with notice but did not appear or contest the proceedings. The High Court, after hearing the appellant's counsel and perusing the record, found that the wife's absence for over 7 years and her failure to contest the proceedings clearly established desertion. The court held that the Trial Court erred in dismissing the petition and allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned judgment and decree. The marriage was dissolved by a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Headnote

A) Hindu Marriage Act - Divorce - Desertion - Section 13(1)(ib) - The appellant/husband sought dissolution of marriage on the ground of desertion, alleging that the respondent/wife left the matrimonial home in 2010 and did not return despite efforts. The Trial Court dismissed the petition. On appeal, the High Court held that the wife's absence for over 7 years without reasonable cause and her failure to contest the proceedings established desertion. The court allowed the appeal and granted a decree of divorce. (Paras 1-6)

B) Hindu Marriage Act - Ex-parte Proceedings - Non-contest by Respondent - Section 13(1)(ib) - The respondent/wife was served with notice but remained unrepresented and did not contest the petition. The High Court noted that the wife's absence and lack of response supported the husband's case of desertion. The court held that the Trial Court erred in dismissing the petition despite the wife's desertion and non-contest. (Paras 2-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant/husband is entitled to a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, when the respondent/wife has been absent for over 7 years and has not contested the proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and decree dated 07.10.2017 passed by the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Raibag in M.C.No.15/2017 is set aside. The marriage between the appellant and respondent is dissolved by a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Law Points

  • Desertion
  • Divorce
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • Section 13(1)(ib)
  • Burden of Proof
  • Ex-parte Decree
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (09) 17

Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 104251 of 2017 (MC-)

2023-09-27

S.R. Krishna Kumar, G Basavaraja

A.M. Gundawade, Sangamesh S. Gulappanavar

Sri Bhimrao S/o. Namdev Savnt

Smt. Santoshi W/o. Bhimro Savant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of divorce petition on ground of desertion.

Remedy Sought

Appellant/husband sought setting aside of Trial Court's judgment and decree dismissing his divorce petition and grant of divorce.

Filing Reason

Appellant alleged that respondent/wife deserted him without reasonable cause since 2010.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court dismissed the divorce petition in M.C.No.15/2017 on 07.10.2017.

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel argued that the wife left the matrimonial home in 2010 and did not return despite efforts, constituting desertion. The wife did not contest the proceedings, supporting the claim.

Ratio Decidendi

Desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is established when one spouse leaves the matrimonial home without reasonable cause and does not return for a continuous period of not less than two years preceding the presentation of the petition. In this case, the wife's absence for over 7 years and her failure to contest the proceedings proved desertion, entitling the husband to a divorce.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal by the petitioner/husband in M.C.No.15/2017 is directed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 07.10.2017 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge & JMFC., Raibag... whereby, the said petition filed by the appellant/husband against the respondent/wife seeking dissolution of their marriage by a decree for divorce on the ground of desertion was dismissed by the Trial Court. The material on record discloses that the respondent/wife has deserted the appellant/husband since 2010 and she has not chosen to contest the petition before the Trial Court.

Procedural History

The appellant/husband filed M.C.No.15/2017 before the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Raibag seeking divorce on ground of desertion. The Trial Court dismissed the petition on 07.10.2017. The appellant then filed this Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 28(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. The High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 27.09.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13(1)(ib), Section 28(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Conviction under Section 489C IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellants knew or had reason to believe the notes were counterfei...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Appeal in Divorce Case on Ground of Desertion — Sets Aside Trial Court's Dismissal of Petition. Marriage Dissolved Under Section 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as Wife's Absence for Over 7 Years Const...