High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of BMTC Employee Challenging Reversion Without Natural Justice. Reversion from Office Helper to Cleaner Quashed for Violation of Audi Alteram Partem.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M.B. Jayadevaiah, was employed as an Office Helper with the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC). He was appointed as an Office Helper on 01.10.1997. However, by a General Establishment Order No.533/2002 dated 04.09.2002, his post was re-designated as Cleaner, effectively reverting him. Subsequently, an office order dated 15.03.2014 was issued by the second respondent confirming his status as Cleaner. The petitioner challenged both orders by filing a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash them. The petitioner contended that the reversion was made without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The respondents argued that the reversion was based on a general policy and that the petitioner had accepted the change. The court examined the matter and found that the impugned orders were passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The court held that such reversion without following the principles of natural justice is unsustainable. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned orders, and directed the respondents to reinstate the petitioner to the post of Office Helper with all consequential benefits. The court also directed that the petitioner be notionally treated as continuing in the post of Office Helper for all purposes.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Reversion - Principles of Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - The petitioner was reverted from the post of Office Helper to Cleaner without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing - The court held that such reversion without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice - The impugned orders were quashed and the respondents were directed to reinstate the petitioner to the post of Office Helper with all consequential benefits (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reversion of the petitioner from the post of Office Helper to Cleaner without issuing a show cause notice or providing an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Impugned orders quashed. Respondents directed to reinstate petitioner to post of Office Helper with all consequential benefits, notionally treating him as continuing in that post.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Reversion without opportunity of hearing
  • Violation of principles of natural justice
  • Quashing of order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (01) 13

Writ Petition No. 31943 of 2014 (S-KSRTC)

2023-01-17

Suraj Govindaraj

V S Naik for petitioner, H R Renuka for respondents

M.B. Jayadevaiah

The Managing Director, BMTC and The Chief Personnel Manager, BMTC

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging reversion order without opportunity of hearing

Remedy Sought

Quashing of General Establishment Order No.533/2002 dated 04.09.2002 and office order dated 15.03.2014, and reinstatement to post of Office Helper

Filing Reason

Petitioner was reverted from Office Helper to Cleaner without show cause notice or hearing

Issues

Whether the reversion of the petitioner from Office Helper to Cleaner without show cause notice or opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that reversion was made without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. Respondents contended that reversion was based on general policy and petitioner had accepted the change.

Ratio Decidendi

Any reversion or adverse order affecting the service conditions of an employee must be preceded by a show cause notice and an opportunity of hearing, failing which the order is violative of principles of natural justice and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction quashing the general establishment Order No.533/2002 vide Reference No. ... dated 04.09.2022 ... and the office Order ... dated 15-03-2014 ... 2. The petitioner was appointed as Office Helper on 01.10.1997. The impugned orders have been passed reverting the petitioner to the post of Cleaner without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing. 3. In that view of the matter, the impugned orders are quashed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner to the post of Office Helper with all consequential benefits.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India challenging reversion orders dated 04.09.2002 and 15.03.2014. The petition came for preliminary hearing in 'B' group and was disposed of on 17.01.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Doctor in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of BMTC Employee Challenging Reversion Without Natural Justice. Reversion from Office Helper to Cleaner Quashed for Violation of Audi Alteram Partem.