High Court partly allowed Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim -- Modified Compensation Award Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act for Death of The deceased

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Insurance Company Ltd. appealed against a Tribunal award granting compensation of Rs.4,24,505/- with 9% interest to the claimants for the death of The deceased in a motor accident. The accident occurred on 01.08.2014 when an unknown vehicle dashed against the deceased's motorcycle. The Insurance Company argued that the claim under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was not maintainable due to procedural lapses and policy violation as the deceased did not have a valid driving licence. The High Court examined the evidence, including the police complaint and witness testimonies, and found that the Insurance Company failed to prove the alleged policy violation. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the burden of proof for such violations lies with the insurer. The appeal was partly allowed and award modified

Headnote

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988-- Sections 163-A and 173 -- Fatal accident-- Claim for compensation filed u/s 163-A of MV Act-- Award of compensation -- Aggrieved-- Challenged by Insurance company in an appeal before High Court-- Liability of insurance company u/s 163-A of MV Act-- Case of Ramkhiladi and Anr (Supra) referred-- Deceased was himself riding the motorcycle at the time of accident-- Deceased was not a third party and he had borrowed the motorcycle thereby he stepped into the shoes of the owner of bike-- Deceased must be third party as Section 163-A is based on the principles of No-fault liability-- Deceased must be necessarily be a third party vis-a-vis the insured vehicle-- Deceased was not a third party as he was driving the vehicle as a borrower, However claimants were entitled to personal accidental coverage to the extent in the policy-- Absence of any enhanced coverage is Rs 1,00,000/--- Compensation beyond the contractual personal accident cover is not maintainable-- Claimants were only entitled to a sum of Rs 1,00,000/- as a personal accidental compensation with 7.5% interest-- Award modified-- Amount of compensation reduced-- Appeal Partly allowed

Para-- 12, 16, 17, 18

Issue of Consideration: The Issue of Consideration was whether the Insurance Company could be held liable for compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 despite allegations of policy violation and lack of valid driving licence by the deceased

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal's award of Rs.4,24,505/- with 9% interest per annum, fastening liability on the Insurance Company

2026 LawText (KAR) (01) 53

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.102958 of 2017 (MV)

2026-01-23

Dr. Justice K. Manmadha Rao

MFA No.102958 of 2017

Sri. Suresh S. Gundi (for appellant), Sri. M.H. Patil (for respondents 1 to 5)

National Insurance Company Ltd., represented by its Divisional Manager

Smt. Shobha wd/o. Prakash Chigare, Aditya s/o. Prakash Chigare, Aman s/o. Prakash Chigare, Shrihari s/o. Prakash Chigare (minor represented by mother), Smt. Yallubai wd/o. Baburao Chigare, Shri. Jayakumar Suresh Patil

Nature of Litigation: Appeal against compensation award in a motor accident claim case

Remedy Sought

The appellant Insurance Company sought to set aside the Tribunal's judgment and award dated 08.06.2017

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging the liability and quantum of compensation

Previous Decisions

The VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi awarded compensation of Rs.4,24,505/- with 9% interest to the claimants

Issues

Whether the claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was maintainable Whether the Insurance Company could avoid liability due to alleged policy violation regarding the deceased's driving licence

Submissions/Arguments

The Insurance Company argued that the claim was not maintainable under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 due to delay in police complaint and absence of medico-legal case The Insurance Company contended that the deceased lacked a valid driving licence, violating policy conditions under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 The claimants maintained that the accident was caused by an unknown vehicle and the deceased was earning Rs.40,000/- per annum

Ratio Decidendi

The burden of proving policy violation under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 lies on the Insurance Company -- In the absence of conclusive evidence that the deceased did not hold a valid driving licence, the insurer cannot avoid liability -- Claims under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 can be entertained based on factual evidence of accident and negligence

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is by the appellant/Insurance Company challenging liability and quantum under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act The claim petition was filed under section 163-A of the MV Act claiming compensation for the death of Sri Prakash Baburao Chigare The Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition by awarding compensation of Rs.4,24,505/- with interest at the rate of 9% p.a.

Procedural History

The accident occurred on 01.08.2014 -- Claim petition MVC No.1346/2016 was filed before the Tribunal -- The Tribunal passed judgment and award on 08.06.2017 -- The Insurance Company filed appeal MFA No.102958 of 2017 on 23.01.2026 -- The High Court heard the appeal on 06.01.2026 and reserved judgment -- Judgment was delivered on 23.01.2026

Related Judgement
High Court High Court partly allowed Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim -- Modified Compensation Award Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act for Death of The deceased
Related Judgement
High Court "High Court Allows Director's Fraud Allegation Against Loan Sanction to Proceed in Civil Court" "Commercial Court's rejection overturned as fraud claims bypass SARFAESI Act jurisdiction."