High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim Due to Smallness of Amount. Court holds that compensation of Rs.3,56,500/- is just and reasonable and no interference is warranted under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Gujarat High Court

Admin

2026-05-19 18:58:08

Font size:

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the Oriental Insurance Co Ltd under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 21.10.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Tharad in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.130 of 2018. The Tribunal had awarded compensation of Rs.3,56,500/- to the victim of a road accident, Ishwarbhai Melabhai Bhat and others. The Insurance Company appealed, contending that the award was excessive or otherwise erroneous. However, the High Court, after hearing the learned advocates for both sides, noted that the amount involved in the appeal was small and meagre. The Court took the view that the compensation awarded appeared to be just and reasonable, and therefore no interference was called for. Consequently, the Court disposed of the First Appeal solely on the ground of the smallness of the amount. Importantly, the Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits or the questions of law raised in the appeal, and those issues were kept open to be urged in other proceedings arising from the same road accident or the same judgment and award. The Court further directed that this order would not come in the way of adjudication of any other pending First Appeal against the same judgment and award, or any other claim petition arising from the same accident. Additionally, since the appeal was disposed of only on the monetary value contention, the principle of res judicata would not apply.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Smallness of Amount - Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Insurance Company challenged compensation award of Rs.3,56,500/- on merits - Court disposed of appeal solely on ground of smallness of amount, holding compensation to be just and reasonable - No opinion expressed on merits or questions of law, which remain open for other proceedings - Principle of res judicata not applied (Paras 1-4).

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court should interfere with the compensation award of Rs.3,56,500/- passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a road accident claim, given the smallness of the amount.

Final Decision

The High Court disposed of the First Appeal solely on the ground of smallness of amount, holding that the compensation awarded is just and reasonable and no interference is called for. The Court clarified that no opinion is expressed on merits or questions of law, which remain open for other proceedings. The principle of res judicata shall not apply.

Law Points

Smallness of amount
Just compensation
No interference on merits
Res judicata not applicable

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:4688

R/First Appeal No. 4006 of 2022

2026-01-22

Hasmukh D. Suthar

2026:GUJHC:4688

Mr. Tanmay B. Karia for Appellant, Mr. Hiren M. Modi for Defendants No.1,2

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd

Ishwarbhai Melabhai Bhat & Ors.

Nature of Litigation

First Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging compensation award in motor accident claim.

Remedy Sought

Insurance Company sought reduction or setting aside of compensation award of Rs.3,56,500/-.

Filing Reason

Insurance Company challenged the judgment and award dated 21.10.2021 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Tharad in MACP No.130 of 2018.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Tharad awarded Rs.3,56,500/- to the victim in MACP No.130 of 2018 on 21.10.2021.

Issues

Whether the compensation award of Rs.3,56,500/- is just and reasonable and requires interference under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant Insurance Company argued that the compensation awarded is excessive or erroneous. Respondents supported the award as just and reasonable.

Ratio Decidendi

When the amount involved in a First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is small and meagre, the court may dispose of the appeal without expressing any opinion on merits or questions of law, keeping them open for other proceedings, and the principle of res judicata shall not apply.

Judgment Excerpts

Since the amount involved in the First Appeal is small and meagre, paying due regard to smallness of amount, this Court is of the considered view that the First Appeal should be disposed of as compensation awarded seems to be just and reasonable and no interference is called. This Court has not expressed any opinion on merits and question of law raised in this First Appeal and is kept open to be urged in other proceedings which may arise from the same road accident / same judgment and award.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Tharad passed judgment and award dated 21.10.2021 in MACP No.130 of 2018 awarding Rs.3,56,500/-. The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd filed First Appeal No.4006 of 2022 under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the High Court of Gujarat. The High Court heard the appeal and disposed it on 22.01.2026.