NCLAT Stays Impugned Order in Insolvency Appeal Subject to Deposit of Outstanding Amount by Appellant. The Tribunal directed deposit of Rs.2,95,68,940/- under Section 9 of IBC, 2016, and encouraged settlement.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 69
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, passed an interim order in an appeal filed by Naresh Kumar Agarwal, the suspended director of Bharat Hitech (Cement) Pvt Ltd., against G R Infraprojects Ltd. and another respondent. The appeal arose from the admission of a Section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant's counsel submitted that the appellant was a healthy company carrying out various projects and supplying cement, and that it had received a request for supply of 27,000 cement bags in September, which were ready, but due to non-issuance of waybills by the Railways, the supply could not be made. The appellant expressed readiness to deposit the amount claimed in the Section 9 application. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the total outstanding amount of Rs.2,95,68,940/- within two weeks before the Registrar of NCLAT in a Fixed Deposit receipt to earn interest. The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents, granting three weeks for reply and two weeks for rejoinder. The Tribunal also observed that parties may still make efforts to settle the matter and stayed the impugned order in the meantime. The appeal was listed for further hearing on 03rd July, 2024.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Interim Stay - Section 9, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The appellant, a suspended director of a corporate debtor, challenged the admission of a Section 9 application. The Appellate Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the total outstanding amount of Rs.2,95,68,940/- within two weeks before the Registrar in a Fixed Deposit receipt to earn interest, and stayed the impugned order in the meantime. The Tribunal also encouraged parties to make efforts to settle the matter. (Paras 1-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant should be granted interim stay of the impugned order subject to deposit of the outstanding amount claimed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the total outstanding amount of Rs.2,95,68,940/- within two weeks before the Registrar of NCLAT in a Fixed Deposit receipt to earn interest. The impugned order was stayed in the meantime. The appeal was listed for 03rd July, 2024, and parties were encouraged to settle.

Law Points

  • Interim stay
  • deposit of amount
  • settlement efforts
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 126

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 885 of 2024

2024-05-03

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra, Arun Baroka

Mr. Arjun Syal, Mr. Shreyan Das, Mr. Ranjan K. Rout

Naresh Kumar Agarwal (Suspended Director of Bharat Hitech (Cement) Pvt Ltd.)

G R Infraprojects Ltd. & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against admission of Section 9 application under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought interim stay of the impugned order and ultimately setting aside of the admission of the Section 9 application.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the order admitting the Section 9 application filed by the respondent for alleged default in payment of dues.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority admitted the Section 9 application, which is the impugned order.

Issues

Whether the appellant should be granted interim stay of the impugned order subject to deposit of the outstanding amount.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant submitted that it is a healthy company carrying out various projects and supplying cement, and that it had received a request for supply of 27,000 cement bags which were ready but could not be supplied due to non-issuance of waybills by Railways. Appellant expressed readiness to deposit the amount claimed in the Section 9 application.

Ratio Decidendi

In an appeal against admission of a Section 9 application, the Appellate Tribunal may grant interim stay subject to deposit of the outstanding amount to protect the interests of both parties while encouraging settlement.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Counsel for the Appellant is ready to deposit the amount claimed in the Section 9 application. Let Appellant deposit the total outstanding amount i.e., Rs.2,95,68,940/- within two weeks before the Registrar, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in a Fixed Deposit receipt to earned interest. In the meantime, the order impugned shall remain stayed.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an appeal before NCLAT against the order of the Adjudicating Authority admitting a Section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. On 03.05.2024, the Tribunal passed an interim order directing deposit of the outstanding amount and staying the impugned order.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Land Acquisition Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Act. Land Owner's Property Acquired Without Proper Application by SRA and Without Opportunity of Hearing.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Personal Guarantor to Travel Abroad for Sister-in-Law's Marriage, Holds Right to Travel Abroad Part of Personal Liberty Under Article 21 of Constitution of India. The court set aside Debt Recovery Tribunal's order refusing tr...