High Court grants Bail to Applicant in Murder and MCOCA Case Involving Former Minister's Killing -- Allegations of Organised Crime Syndicate Membership and Firearm Offences Under BNS, Arms Act, and Maharashtra Police Act

Sub Category: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment involves a bail application by Applicant, accused in a high-profile murder case of a former minister, with additional charges under MCOCA. The Applicant sought bail after rejection by the lower court, arguing false implication and lack of evidence. The prosecution countered with evidence of phone calls linking the Applicant to other accused and alleged involvement in an organised crime syndicate. The High Court, after examining the materials, granted bail, emphasizing the stringent provisions of MCOCA 

Headnote

Criminal Law--  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS)-- Sections 103(1), 109, 125, and 3(5) -- Arms Act, 1959--Sections 3, 5, 25, and 27 -- Maharashtra Police Act, 1951-- Sections 37 and 135 -- Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) --Sections 3(1)(i)(ii), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4)-- Application for bail-- Applicant was an accused -- Murder of former minister of state-- Name of 27 persons revealed during the course of investigation including applicant-- Plea for bail-- Case of prosecution hinges on two calls made by him to A-15-- No material on record to establish that the applicant is connected with A-15 concerning alleged offence-- Only bare allegation unsupported by any materials-- A-5 and A-15 did not named the applicant in their confessional statements as a person involved in alleged offence-- Photograph as to holding a gun does not iteself establish that he has participated in the criminal conspiracy of murder of deceased-- No material as to depositing money-- No criminal antecedent-- Limtied role of applicant only to the extent of made telephone calls-- Embargo on the grant of bail U/s 21(4) of Act not applicable-- Bail granted-- Application allowed

Para-- 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19

Issue of Consideration: Whether the Applicant should be granted bail in a case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), Arms Act, 1959, Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, and MCOCA, particularly regarding his alleged involvement in an organised crime syndicate and murder of a former minister

Final Decision

The High Court denied bail to the Applicant, holding that the prosecution established a prima facie case under MCOCA, and the Applicant failed to meet the stringent bail criteria, necessitating continued custody pending trial

2026 LawText (BOM) (02) 69

Bail Application No. 3679 of 2025

2026-02-09

Dr. Neela Gokhale J.

2026:BHC-AS:6589

Mr. Abhishek Yende a/w Ms. Surbhi Agrawal, Mr. Shubham Kahite, Mr. Sagar P. for Applicant, Mr. Mahesh Mule, SPP a/w Mr. Parth Gawde, Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for State-Respondent, Mr. Pradip Gharat a/w Mr. Trivankumar Karnani, Ms. Hritika Jannawar, Mr. Sumit Jadhav for Intervenor

Akashdeep Karaj Singh

State of Maharashtra

Nature of Litigation: Criminal bail application in a murder case with additional charges under special statutes like MCOCA

Remedy Sought

The Applicant is seeking enlargement on bail from the High Court after rejection by the lower court

Filing Reason

The Applicant filed the bail application due to alleged false implication and lack of incriminating evidence against him

Previous Decisions

The Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge under MCOCA rejected the bail application on 19th July 2025

Issues

Whether the Applicant should be granted bail under the stringent provisions of MCOCA and other penal statutes Whether there is sufficient prima facie evidence to link the Applicant to the organised crime syndicate and the murder

Submissions/Arguments

The Applicant argued false implication, no incriminating material, no membership in the syndicate, and no criminal antecedents The prosecution argued evidence of phone calls linking the Applicant to other accused, use of internet hotspot, and involvement in the syndicate as per investigation

Ratio Decidendi

In bail applications under MCOCA, the court must apply stringent scrutiny and require the prosecution to show prima facie involvement in organised crime; mere denial or lack of direct evidence is insufficient if circumstantial evidence suggests complicity

Judgment Excerpts

The offence relates to the murder of one Ziauddin Abdul Rahim Siddiqui @ Baba Siddiqui, former Minister in the State of Maharashtra The Applicant made an application seeking bail before the Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge under the MCOCA, however, by order dated 19th July 2025, the said application was rejected Mr. Yende relied on the confessional statements of Sujit Singh (A-15) and Nitin Sapre (A-5), who according to the prosecution, were contacted by the Applicant, to show that neither of them have even mentioned the name of the Applicant

Procedural History

FIR registered on 13th October 2024 -- Investigation revealed involvement of 27 persons, including the Applicant -- MCOCA provisions added after approvals in November 2024 and January 2025 -- Bail application rejected by lower court on 19th July 2025 -- Present bail application filed in High Court, heard and reserved on 03rd February 2026, pronounced on 09th February 2026

Related Judgement
High Court High Court grants Bail to Applicant in Murder and MCOCA Case Involving Former Mi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Burial Rights of Christian Convert – Ensuring Equality a...