High Court Allows Writ Petition for Full Salary Grant to Teacher Transferred Under MEPS Rules -- Quashes Partial Grant Approval as Arbitrary and Contrary to Statutory Provisions

Sub Category: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, challenged the Deputy Director of Education's order approving his transfer from an unaided to a fully aided post of Assistant Teacher but granting salary grants partially, starting at 20% and increasing to 100% over five years. The Petitioner argued that under Rule 41 of The Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 (MEPS Rules), he was entitled to full salary grants from the transfer date. The State relied on a Government Resolution dated 28 June 2016 to justify the partial grants. The High Court held that the transfer was governed by MEPS Rules, making the Government Resolution inapplicable. The Court found the partial grant policy arbitrary and directed the Deputy Director to modify the approval to grant 100% salary benefits effective from 1 July 2017, with arrears payable within three months.

Headnote

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, in Writ Petition No. 6810 of 2024, allowed the petition filed by Petitioner -- The Court held that the Deputy Director of Education's approval order, which granted salary grants partially at 20% initially and increasing annually to 100% over five years, was arbitrary and contrary to Rule 41 of The Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 (MEPS Rules) -- The Petitioner, appointed on an unaided post in 2008 and transferred to a fully aided post in 2017 under Rule 41 of MEPS Rules, was entitled to 100% salary grant effective from the date of transfer -- The Court found the Government Resolution dated 28 June 2016 inapplicable as it pertained to transfers not governed by MEPS Rules -- The impugned order was quashed and set aside, with directions to release full salary grants retrospectively -- Paragraphs 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Issue of Consideration: The Issue of whether the Deputy Director of Education was justified in approving only partial salary grants for a teacher transferred from an unaided to a fully aided post under Rule 41 of the MEPS Rules, 1981

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the Writ Petition, quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 23 August 2023, and directed the Deputy Director of Education to issue a modified approval order granting 100% salary grant to the Petitioner effective from 1 July 2017, with arrears payable within three months

2026 LawText (BOM) (02) 44

Writ Petition No. 6810 of 2024

2026-02-03

R. G. Avachat J. , Ajit B. Kadethankar J.

2026:BHC-KOL:899-DB

Mr. Prashant Bhavake, Mr. V. M. Mali

Parshuram Umaji Dalavi

The State of Maharashtra, The Deputy Director of Education, Kolhapur Region, Nav Maharashtra Shikshan Mandal, Mangaon, Shri Ramling High School & Junior College, Tudave

Nature of Litigation: Writ Petition challenging administrative order regarding salary grants for a teacher transferred from unaided to aided post

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks directions to modify approval order to grant 100% salary benefits from transfer date

Filing Reason

Deputy Director of Education approved partial salary grants, which Petitioner claims is unjustified under MEPS Rules

Previous Decisions

Deputy Director granted approval for transfer with 20% grant in 2018, revised to incremental grants in 2023

Issues

Whether the Deputy Director of Education was justified in approving partial salary grants for a transfer under Rule 41 of MEPS Rules Whether the Government Resolution dated 28 June 2016 applies to transfers governed by MEPS Rules

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued entitlement to full salary grant from transfer date under MEPS Rules State relied on Government Resolution to justify partial grant policy

Ratio Decidendi

Transfers under Rule 41 of MEPS Rules entitle employees to full benefits of the new post, including salary grants -- Administrative actions must not be arbitrary and must comply with statutory provisions -- Government resolutions cannot override specific rules under MEPS Rules

Judgment Excerpts

Held that the transfer was governed by Rule 41 of MEPS Rules, making the Government Resolution inapplicable Held that the partial grant policy was arbitrary and the Petitioner is entitled to 100% salary grant from the date of transfer

Procedural History

Petitioner appointed on unaided post in 2008, transferred to aided post in 2017 under Rule 41 of MEPS Rules -- Deputy Director granted approval with partial grants in 2018 and revised in 2023 -- Petitioner filed Writ Petition in 2024 -- High Court heard matter for final disposal and allowed petition

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim in GST Arrest Case -- Petitioner's ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Writ Petition for Full Salary Grant to Teacher Transferred Und...