Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Missing Person Declaration Case — Father Presumed Dead After 7 Years of Unexplained Disappearance. Presumption of Death Under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Applies When Person Missing for Over 7 Years and Not Heard Of.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 139
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Vishwesh Dogra Suvarna, filed a suit in the Trial Court seeking a declaration that his father be declared as 'dead'. The father had been missing since 8 April 2003, and the plaintiff had lodged a complaint with the police, obtained a police certificate, and published newspaper advertisements, but the father was not traced. The Trial Court dismissed the suit on the ground that no evidence was led regarding the father's memory loss and that the plaintiff failed to prove he was the sole legal heir. The appellant appealed to the Bombay High Court. The High Court framed the issue of whether the Trial Court was justified in refusing the declaration. The Court held that the presumption under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 applies when a person is missing for seven years and not heard of by those who would naturally have heard of him if alive. The plaintiff had produced sufficient evidence including a police complaint, certificate, ration card, birth certificate, passport, and newspaper advertisement. The Court found that the Trial Court erred in requiring evidence of memory loss and in not applying the presumption. The appeal was allowed, the judgment of the Trial Court was set aside, and the father was declared dead. The Court directed the authorities to issue a death certificate accordingly.

Headnote

A) Evidence Act - Presumption of Death - Section 108 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Suit for declaration of father as dead - Plaintiff son filed suit seeking declaration that his father be presumed dead as he was missing since 8 April 2003 and not heard of for over 7 years - Trial Court dismissed suit on ground that no evidence of memory loss or that plaintiff is sole heir - Held that presumption under Section 108 applies when a person is missing for 7 years and not heard of by those who would naturally have heard of him if alive; plaintiff's evidence of police complaint, certificate, ration card, birth certificate, passport, newspaper advertisement sufficient to shift burden on defendant - Appeal allowed, father declared dead (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Trial Court was justified in refusing to grant a declaration that the plaintiff's father be declared as 'dead' despite evidence of him being missing for over 7 years.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Judgment and order dated 31 October 2015 of the Trial Court is set aside. The father of the appellant is declared dead. The authorities are directed to issue a death certificate accordingly.

Law Points

  • Presumption of death under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • Burden of proof
  • Missing person declaration
  • Suit for declaration of death
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (01) 211

First Appeal No. 55 of 2016 with Interim Application No. 3710 of 2019

2026-01-29

Jitendra Jain

2026:BHC-AS:4470

Mr. K. B. Adyanthaya i/by Mr. R. K. Shetty for the Appellant, Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, AGP for the Respondent

Vishwesh Dogra Suvarna

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against dismissal of suit for declaration of father as dead

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the plaintiff's father be declared as 'dead'

Filing Reason

Father missing since 8 April 2003 and not heard of for over 7 years

Previous Decisions

Trial Court dismissed the suit on 31 October 2015

Issues

Whether the Trial Court was justified in refusing to grant a declaration that the plaintiff's father be declared as 'dead' despite evidence of him being missing for over 7 years.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that father was missing since 8 April 2003 and not heard of, and presumption under Section 108 of Evidence Act applies. Respondent argued that no evidence of memory loss or that plaintiff is sole heir.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, if a person has not been heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him if alive, the presumption of death arises. The burden shifts to the party denying death. The plaintiff's evidence of police complaint, certificate, and other documents is sufficient to invoke the presumption.

Judgment Excerpts

The short issue which arises for my consideration is whether the Trial Court was justified in refusing to grant a declaration sought for the plaintiff's father be declared as 'dead'. Under Section 108 of the Evidence Act, if a person is missing for seven years and not heard of by those who would naturally have heard of him if alive, the presumption of death arises.

Procedural History

Plaintiff filed suit in Trial Court seeking declaration of father as dead. Trial Court dismissed suit on 31 October 2015. Plaintiff filed First Appeal No. 55 of 2016 in Bombay High Court. High Court allowed appeal on 29 January 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 108
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Allotment After 13 Years — Delay Unreasonable Despite No Limitation Prescribed Under UPZALR Act. Allottees Who Constructed Houses and Resided for 13 Years Have Legitimate Expectation; Suo Mot...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Missing Person Declaration Case — Father Presumed Dead After 7 Years of Unexplained Disappearance. Presumption of Death Under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Applies When Person Missing for Over 7 Yea...