High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Domestic Violence Proceedings - Relationship in Nature of Marriage Established Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court dismissed a Criminal Writ Petition filed by four petitioners seeking to quash proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 initiated by respondents -- Petitioners argued no domestic relationship existed between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 1 as they never lived in shared household -- Respondents contended relationship in nature of marriage existed, resulting in pregnancy and birth of child -- Court examined Supreme Court guidelines for establishing 'relationship in nature of marriage' and found prima facie evidence supporting respondents' claims -- Court held proceedings should continue for proper evidence examination and dismissed petition as premature -- Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 interpreted liberally to include various relationships

Headnote

The High Court dismissed Criminal Writ Petition challenging proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 -- Petitioners sought quashing of orders dated 08.09.2022 and 19.10.2023 in PWDVA No. 20/2022 -- Court examined whether relationship between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 1 constituted 'relationship in nature of marriage' under Section 2(f) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 -- Applied guidelines from D. Velusamy Vs. D. Patchaiammal and Indra Sarma Vs. V.K. Sarma -- Found prima facie evidence of domestic relationship based on prolonged sexual relationship, conception of children, and acknowledgment as husband-wife -- Held proceedings should continue for evidence examination -- Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (D.V Act) interpreted liberally to protect women's rights

Issue of Consideration: Whether the proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 should be quashed on grounds of absence of domestic relationship between parties

Final Decision

High Court dismissed Criminal Writ Petition No. 209/2024, allowing proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 to continue for proper evidence examination

2026 LawText (BOM) (01) 90

Criminal Writ Petition No. 209/2024

2026-01-20

M. M. Nerlikar J.

2026:BHC-NAG:1174

Mr. A.R. Fule, Mr. J.A. Anthony

Pravin Satyanarayan Battulwar, Satyanarayan Mallya Battulwar, Laxmibai Satyanarayan Batulwar, Chayarani Pravin Battulwar

Meena Pravin Battulwar, Shrinidhi d/o. Pravin Battulwar

Nature of Litigation: Criminal Writ Petition challenging domestic violence proceedings

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of entire proceedings including orders dated 08.09.2022 and 19.10.2023 in PWDVA No. 20/2022

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed no domestic relationship existed between parties, making proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 invalid

Previous Decisions

Judicial Magistrate First Class granted interim maintenance of Rs. 5000/- per month to respondent No. 1 and Rs. 2000 to respondent No. 2 in PWDVA No. 20/2022

Issues

Whether relationship between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 1 constituted 'relationship in nature of marriage' under Section 2(f) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Whether proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 should be quashed at preliminary stage

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued no relationship in nature of marriage existed as parties never lived in shared household and did not portray themselves as spouses to society Respondents argued relationship in nature of marriage existed based on prolonged sexual relationship, conception of children, and acknowledgment as husband-wife, requiring liberal interpretation of domestic relationship definition

Ratio Decidendi

Relationship in nature of marriage under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 should be interpreted liberally to protect women's rights -- Prima facie evidence of prolonged sexual relationship, conception of children, and acknowledgment as husband-wife establishes domestic relationship -- Proceedings should not be quashed at preliminary stage when prima facie case exists

Judgment Excerpts

'The couple must hold themselves out to the society as being akin to spouses' -- Guidelines from D. Velusamy case 'Duration of period of relationship' -- Relevant condition from Indra Sarma case 'Prima facie it appears that there was a relationship between the couple' -- Court's observation on evidence

Procedural History

FIR lodged by respondent No. 1 on 07.05.2022 alleging sexual abuse -- Charge sheet filed on 26.06.2022 -- Petitioner No. 1 married petitioner No. 4 on 06.07.2022 -- Respondent filed complaint under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 -- Judicial Magistrate granted interim maintenance -- Petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition challenging proceedings -- High Court heard arguments and dismissed petition

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Domestic Violence Proceedings - Relationship in Nature of Marriage Established Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Related Judgement
Supreme Court "Supreme Court Settles Land Acquisition Dispute: Compensation Ordered for Safety Zone Land in Cement Project" "Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. held not liable for compensation; State of Himachal Pradesh to pay and recover from Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL...