Bombay High Court Directs State to Implement Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 — Failure to Constitute Committees and Submit Annual Reports Violates Statutory Obligations. State Coordination Committee and Executive Committee must be properly constituted and meet regularly to ensure effective implementation of the Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 96
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns a public interest litigation filed by Prerna Apang Seva Sanghatana, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, with the objective of rehabilitating persons with disabilities. The petition was originally filed at the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court and later transferred to the Principal Seat at Mumbai. Since no one appeared for the petitioner after transfer, Shri Uday P. Warunjikar was appointed as Amicus Curiae. The petition highlighted the failure of the State of Maharashtra to implement various provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. The specific grievances included: (i) improper constitution of the State Coordination Committee under Section 13, which performs important functions under Section 18; (ii) regular meetings of the State Coordination Committee not being held; (iii) improper constitution of the State Executive Committee under Section 19, particularly the appointment under Clause (e) of Sub-section (2); (iv) meetings of the State Executive Committee not being regularly held; (v) Annual Report under Section 65 not prepared or submitted after the Financial Year 2006-2007; and (vi) other related failures. The court, with the assistance of the Amicus Curiae, examined the grievances and found that the State had indeed failed to comply with its statutory obligations. The court directed the State Government to take immediate steps to properly constitute the State Coordination Committee and the State Executive Committee in accordance with the Act, ensure regular meetings, and prepare and submit the Annual Report. The judgment emphasizes the importance of these committees in the effective implementation of the Disabilities Act and the need for the State to fulfill its duties towards persons with disabilities.

Headnote

A) Disability Law - Implementation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 - Sections 13, 18, 19, 65 - Failure to Constitute Committees and Submit Reports - The State Government failed to properly constitute the State Coordination Committee under Section 13 and the State Executive Committee under Section 19, and did not hold regular meetings or submit Annual Reports after 2006-2007 - Court directed the State to comply with statutory obligations within three months - Held that the State must ensure proper implementation of the Act (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State of Maharashtra has failed to implement the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, particularly regarding constitution of committees, holding meetings, and submission of annual reports.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the State of Maharashtra to take immediate steps to properly constitute the State Coordination Committee under Section 13 and the State Executive Committee under Section 19 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, ensure regular meetings, and prepare and submit the Annual Report under Section 65. The State was directed to comply within three months.

Law Points

  • Statutory obligation to constitute State Coordination Committee under Section 13
  • State Executive Committee under Section 19
  • hold regular meetings
  • and submit Annual Report under Section 65 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities
  • Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act
  • 1995
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (12) 21

Writ Petition No.5859 of 2008

2016-12-14

A.S. Oka, A.A. Sayed

Shri Uday P. Warunjikar (Amicus Curiae), Shri G.W. Mattos (AGP for State)

Prerna Apang Seva Sanghatana

State of Maharashtra, Through Chief Secretary and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Remedy Sought

Directions to the State of Maharashtra to implement the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, including proper constitution of committees, holding regular meetings, and submission of annual reports.

Filing Reason

Failure of the State Government to implement various provisions of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

Issues

Whether the State of Maharashtra has failed to properly constitute the State Coordination Committee under Section 13 of the Disabilities Act? Whether the State has failed to hold regular meetings of the State Coordination Committee and State Executive Committee? Whether the State has failed to prepare and submit the Annual Report under Section 65 of the Disabilities Act after 2006-2007?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner, through the Amicus Curiae, submitted that the State Coordination Committee under Section 13 was not properly constituted, leading to failure in performing functions under Section 18. The petitioner argued that regular meetings of the State Coordination Committee and State Executive Committee were not being held. The petitioner contended that the Annual Report under Section 65 had not been prepared or submitted after the Financial Year 2006-2007.

Ratio Decidendi

The State Government has a statutory obligation under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 to properly constitute the State Coordination Committee and State Executive Committee, hold regular meetings, and submit annual reports. Failure to do so hampers the implementation of the Act and violates the rights of persons with disabilities.

Judgment Excerpts

This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is in the nature of a public interest litigation. The grievances which can be seen from the Petition as well as the subsequent affidavits on record can be summarized as under: (i) There is no proper constitution of the State Co-ordination Committee in accordance with Sub-section (1) of Section 13 of the Disabilities Act...

Procedural History

The petition was originally filed at the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court and later transferred to the Principal Seat at Mumbai under the orders of the Chief Justice. After transfer, as none appeared for the petitioner, Shri Uday P. Warunjikar was appointed as Amicus Curiae on 23rd October 2008. The judgment was pronounced on 14th December 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995: 13, 18, 19, 65
  • Societies Registration Act, 1860:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs State to Implement Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 — Failure to Constitute Committees and Submit Annual Reports Violates Statutory Obligations. State Coordination Committee and Executive Committee must be properly cons...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Modification of Resolution Plan in IBC Case — Discrimination Between Financial Creditors Not Established. The Court held that the NCLAT erred in modifying the resolution plan approved by the NCLT under Sect...