Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent — Injuries Caused by Stick and Kicks Not Sufficient to Prove Murder Under Section 302 IPC. Conviction for Murder Set Aside as Evidence Shows No Intention to Cause Death or Knowledge That Death Was Likely, Reducing Offence to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder Under Section 304 Part II IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 35
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Maroti Laxmanrao Sariyam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati for the murder of his wife Pramila under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The incident occurred on 12/07/2012 when the appellant, suspecting his wife's fidelity, saw her conversing with a neighbour, Baburao Kose. Enraged, he beat her with a stick and kicks, causing bleeding injuries, including fractured ribs and lung damage. The deceased vomited, was given water, and made to lie down; she was found dead the next morning. The appellant informed the police and his brother-in-law filed a complaint. The trial court held that the injuries were intentionally caused and resulted in death, convicting him under Section 302 IPC. On appeal, the Bombay High Court examined whether the offence amounted to murder. The court noted that the appellant did not use a deadly weapon, gave water to the deceased, and made her lie down, indicating no intention to cause death. The injuries, though serious, were inflicted in a sudden fit of rage due to suspicion of infidelity. The court held that the appellant had knowledge that his act was likely to cause death but no intention to cause death, bringing the case under Section 304 Part II IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder). The court set aside the conviction under Section 302 IPC and convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC, sentencing him to the period already undergone (about 4 years and 4 months) and directing his release unless required in another case.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Intention to Cause Death - The court examined whether the appellant had the intention to cause death or knowledge that death was likely. The injuries, though serious, were inflicted with a stick and kicks, and the appellant gave water and made the deceased lie down, indicating no intention to kill. Held that the offence falls under Section 304 Part II IPC, not Section 302 IPC (Paras 5-8).

B) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder - Section 304 Part II Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Knowledge of Likely Death - The court found that the appellant had knowledge that his act of beating with a stick and kicks was likely to cause death, but no intention to cause death. The deceased died due to injuries to ribs and lungs. Held that the conviction under Section 302 IPC is set aside and converted to Section 304 Part II IPC (Paras 7-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's act of beating his wife with a stick and kicks, resulting in her death, constitutes murder under Section 302 IPC or a lesser offence under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The conviction under Section 302 IPC is set aside. The appellant is convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to the period of imprisonment already undergone (about 4 years and 4 months). The appellant is directed to be released forthwith unless required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • intention to cause death
  • knowledge of likelihood of death
  • culpable homicide not amounting to murder
  • nature of injuries
  • single blow theory
  • sudden provocation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (11) 41

Criminal Appeal No.58 of 2015

2016-11-17

B.P. Dharmadhikari, S.B. Shukre

Shri R.M. Daruwala (appointed) for the Appellant, Shri R.S. Nayak, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State

Maroti Laxmanrao Sariyam

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for murder of his wife.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Issues

Whether the appellant's act constitutes murder under Section 302 IPC or a lesser offence under Section 304 Part II IPC. Whether the appellant had intention to cause death or knowledge that death was likely.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that there was no intention to cause death and the act was done in a sudden fit of rage. State argued that the injuries were serious and caused death, supporting conviction under Section 302 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant had no intention to cause death but had knowledge that his act of beating with a stick and kicks was likely to cause death. Therefore, the offence falls under Section 304 Part II IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) and not Section 302 IPC (murder).

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant was the husband of deceased Pramila. He noticed some time before the incident that deceased Pramila and appellant’s neighbour Baburao Kose had become too friendly with each other. On 12/07/2012, at about 5:00 p.m., the appellant returned home and saw his wife as conversing with Baburao jovially. It infuriated him so much that he picked up a stick and beat up his wife by the stick as well as by kick blows. The appellant then made her lie down and go to sleep. In the morning of the next day, the appellant found his wife as dead. The learned Additional Sessions Judge found that the injuries suffered by deceased Pramila were caused to her intentionally by the appellant. The court found that the appellant had knowledge that his act was likely to cause death but no intention to cause death.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted and sentenced by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati on 08/12/2014 in Sessions Trial No.62/2013 for murder under Section 302 IPC. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 17/11/2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304 Part II
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent — Injuries Caused by Stick and Kicks Not Sufficient to Prove Murder Under Section 302 IPC. Conviction for Murder Set Aside as Evidence Shows No Intention to Cause Death or Kno...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal and Convicts Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302/34 IPC. Common Intention Was Established Through Exhortation and Presence at Crime Scene as Per Consistent Eyewitness Testimony, Overturning High Court's Decision ...