Bombay High Court Directs Labour Court to Expedite Disposal of Employee's Complaint by February 20, 2017, with Interim Protection. Employee Granted Protection from Notice Pending Disposal of Complaint Before Labour Court.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 27
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, an employee of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, filed a writ petition seeking protection against a notice issued by the employer. The parties agreed that the petition could be disposed of based on an earlier order dated 29.07.2016 in Writ Petition No. 4318 of 2016, with a modification extending the deadline from 20th January, 2017 to 20th February, 2017. The High Court, without examining the merits, directed the Labour Court to dispose of the employee's complaint by 20th February, 2017. It further ordered that the employer shall not act on the notice challenged by the employee before the Labour Court until that date. If the Labour Court is unable to dispose of the complaint due to non-cooperation of the employee, it may pass appropriate interim orders after 20th February, 2017. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Interim Protection - Expeditious Disposal - The High Court directed the Labour Court to dispose of the employee's complaint by 20th February, 2017, and granted interim protection to the employee from being acted upon the notice challenged, till that date, without delving into merits. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the employee should be granted interim protection pending disposal of the complaint before the Labour Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Labour Court is directed to dispose of the complaint filed by the petitioner till 20th February, 2017. The protection granted to the employee shall operate till 20th February, 2017. The employer shall not act on the notice challenged by the employee before the Labour Court till 20th February, 2017. If the Labour Court is not able to dispose of the complaint due to non-cooperation of the employee, it may pass appropriate interim orders after 20th February, 2017. The petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interim protection
  • expeditious disposal
  • labour court
  • employee protection
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (10) 165

Writ Petition No. 5975 of 2016

2016-10-13

R. K. Deshpande

Shri C.V. Jagdale for Petitioner, Shri V.G. Wankhede for Respondents

Kondu Arjun Maraskolhe

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, through its Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C Arni Road, Yavatmal and another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking interim protection against a notice issued by the employer.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought protection from the notice challenged before the Labour Court and expeditious disposal of the complaint.

Filing Reason

The employee challenged a notice issued by the employer before the Labour Court and sought interim protection.

Previous Decisions

An order dated 29.07.2016 in Writ Petition No. 4318 of 2016 was passed by the same Court, which the parties agreed to follow with modification.

Issues

Whether the employee should be granted interim protection pending disposal of the complaint before the Labour Court.

Submissions/Arguments

The parties agreed that the petition could be disposed of based on the order dated 29.07.2016 in Writ Petition No. 4318 of 2016, with the modification that the date 20th January, 2017 be extended to 20th February, 2017.

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted interim protection to the employee without delving into merits, directing expeditious disposal of the complaint by the Labour Court, to sub-serve the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsels appearing for the parties submit that this writ petition can be disposed of on the basis of order dated 29.07.2016 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 4318 of 2016, with the modification that instead the date 20th January, 2017 occurring in the said order be extended till 20th February, 2017. Considering the fact that the petitioner – employee continues in service, without delving into the merits of the matter, the following order is passed to sub-serve the ends of justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court seeking interim protection. The parties agreed to dispose of the petition based on an earlier order in Writ Petition No. 4318 of 2016 with a modification of the deadline. The High Court passed the order on 13th October, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Labour Court to Expedite Disposal of Employee's Complaint by February 20, 2017, with Interim Protection. Employee Granted Protection from Notice Pending Disposal of Complaint Before Labour Court.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Father Seeking Custody of Children from Mother in Cross-Border Dispute. Court holds that habeas corpus is not maintainable when children are in lawful custody of their mother and custody issues ar...