Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Societies' Petition Against Rejection of Nomination Forms for Federation Elections. Court holds that Election Authority cannot reject nomination forms on grounds not specified in bye-laws, and requirement of 'clear one month' period under Section 73B of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 was satisfied.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 123
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, eight cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of their nomination forms for the election of the Managing Committee of the Akola District Labour Cooperative Societies Federation Ltd. (Respondent No. 3). The election was scheduled to be held on 17-04-2015, and the election programme was published on 16-03-2015. The petitioners submitted their nomination forms on 23-03-2015, but the State Cooperative Election Authority (Respondent No. 2) rejected them on the ground that they were not filed within the stipulated time as per the election programme. The petitioners contended that the bye-laws of the Federation did not prescribe any time limit for filing nominations, and the election programme could not override the bye-laws. They also argued that the requirement of a 'clear one month' period under Section 73B of the Act was satisfied as the period between 16-03-2015 and 17-04-2015 was 32 days. The respondents argued that the election programme was binding and the nominations were filed late. The court analyzed the bye-laws and found that they did not specify any time limit for filing nominations. The court held that the Election Authority could not reject nomination forms on grounds not specified in the bye-laws, as the bye-laws have statutory force. The court also interpreted 'clear one month' to mean a period of 30 days excluding the date of publication and the date of election, and found that the period of 32 days satisfied this requirement. The court allowed the petition, set aside the rejection of nomination forms, and directed the respondents to treat the nominations as valid and proceed with the election in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Election - Nomination Forms - Rejection - The Election Authority rejected nomination forms of petitioners for election to the Managing Committee of a District Labour Cooperative Societies Federation on the ground that they were not filed within the stipulated time as per the election programme. The court held that the bye-laws of the society did not prescribe any time limit for filing nominations, and the election programme issued by the Authority could not override the bye-laws. The rejection was set aside. (Paras 1-10)

B) Cooperative Law - Election - Time Period - 'Clear One Month' - Section 73B of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 requires that the election programme be published at least one month before the date of election. The court interpreted 'clear one month' to mean a period of 30 days excluding the date of publication and the date of election. In this case, the election programme was published on 16-03-2015 and the election was scheduled for 17-04-2015, which was held to be a period of 32 days, thus satisfying the requirement. (Paras 11-15)

C) Cooperative Law - Bye-laws - Statutory Force - The bye-laws of a cooperative society have statutory force and cannot be overridden by administrative instructions or election programmes issued by the Election Authority. The court emphasized that the Election Authority must act in accordance with the bye-laws and cannot impose additional conditions not found therein. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Cooperative Election Authority could reject the nomination forms of the petitioners for the election of the Managing Committee of the Akola District Labour Cooperative Societies Federation Ltd. on the ground that the forms were not filed within the stipulated time as per the election programme, and whether the requirement of 'clear one month' period under Section 73B of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 was satisfied.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the rejection of nomination forms, and directed the respondents to treat the nominations as valid and proceed with the election in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Election Authority cannot reject nomination forms on grounds not specified in bye-laws
  • Requirement of 'clear one month' period for filing nominations must be strictly construed
  • Bye-laws of cooperative society have statutory force
  • Section 73B of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (07) 118

Writ Petition No. 2833 of 2015

2016-07-11

B.P. Dharmadhikari, Kum. Indira Jain

Shri A.M. Ghare for Petitioners, Shri A.S. Fulzele for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Shri V.G. Wankhede for Respondent No.3

Nalanda Magasvargiya Majoor Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Akola and others

The District Cooperative Election Officer cum District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies Akola and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging rejection of nomination forms for election to Managing Committee of a District Labour Cooperative Societies Federation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the rejection of their nomination forms and direction to treat them as valid.

Filing Reason

The State Cooperative Election Authority rejected the nomination forms of the petitioners on the ground that they were not filed within the stipulated time as per the election programme.

Issues

Whether the Election Authority could reject nomination forms on grounds not specified in the bye-laws of the society. Whether the requirement of 'clear one month' period under Section 73B of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 was satisfied.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the bye-laws did not prescribe any time limit for filing nominations, and the election programme could not override the bye-laws. They also argued that the period between 16-03-2015 and 17-04-2015 was 32 days, satisfying the 'clear one month' requirement. Respondents argued that the election programme was binding and the nominations were filed late.

Ratio Decidendi

The Election Authority cannot reject nomination forms on grounds not specified in the bye-laws of the society, as the bye-laws have statutory force. The requirement of 'clear one month' under Section 73B of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 means a period of 30 days excluding the date of publication and the date of election.

Judgment Excerpts

The bye-laws of the society do not prescribe any time limit for filing nominations. The election programme issued by the Authority cannot override the bye-laws. The period of 'clear one month' means a period of 30 days excluding the date of publication and the date of election.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging the rejection of their nomination forms by the State Cooperative Election Authority. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 11-07-2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 73B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Societies' Petition Against Rejection of Nomination Forms for Federation Elections. Court holds that Election Authority cannot reject nomination forms on grounds not specified in bye-laws, and requirement of 'clea...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Order in SARFAESI Act Case as Writ Petition Against Private Asset Reconstruction Company Not Maintainable. The Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not lie ag...