Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Cooperative Society Membership Transfer Dispute — Minister's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Transfer of membership under Section 22(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 cannot be denied on technical grounds without affording opportunity of hearing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 392
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar @ Dinesh Waman Bhosale, purchased Office No.10 in a building owned by Respondent No.4 society, a commercial premises society, from Smt. Nargis Jal Pardiwala, who was a member in respect of that office. On 29.12.2011, the petitioner applied for transfer of membership from the seller's name to his own. The society rejected the application on 11.01.2012 on the ground that it was not in the prescribed format as per the bye-laws. The petitioner then filed a fresh application on 31.01.2012 in the proper format but received no response. Consequently, he filed an application before the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The society opposed the application, arguing that the application was not in the proper format because there was no bye-law No.38(e)(ii) in the society's bye-laws. The Deputy Registrar, by order dated 29.04.2013, rejected the application on the ground that it was not in the proper format, i.e., not in terms of Form No.1 bye-law No.D1.3. Aggrieved, the petitioner appealed to the Divisional Joint Registrar, who by order dated 15.05.2014 allowed the appeal and directed the society to transfer the membership. The society then filed an appeal before the Minister for Cooperation, who by order dated 25.09.2014 allowed the appeal, set aside the Joint Registrar's order, and confirmed the Deputy Registrar's order. The petitioner challenged the Minister's order by way of a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The main legal issue was whether the Minister's order, passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, was sustainable. The petitioner argued that the Minister's order was passed in violation of natural justice as he was not heard. The respondents contended that the Minister had the power to pass the order. The court analyzed that the Minister's order was a quasi-judicial order and the petitioner, being a party directly affected, ought to have been given an opportunity of hearing. The court held that the Minister's order was in breach of principles of natural justice and therefore unsustainable. The court quashed the Minister's order and remanded the matter back to the Minister for fresh hearing after giving an opportunity of hearing to all parties. The court also directed that the petitioner's application for transfer of membership be considered on its own merits without being influenced by the earlier orders.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Transfer of Membership - Section 22(2) Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Natural Justice - The petitioner applied for transfer of membership after purchasing office premises from a member. The society rejected the application on technical grounds. The Deputy Registrar dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 22(2) for not being in proper format. The Divisional Joint Registrar allowed the appeal. However, the Minister for Cooperation, in a suo motu revision, set aside the Joint Registrar's order without hearing the petitioner. Held that the Minister's order violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not given an opportunity of hearing. The order was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh hearing. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of the Minister for Cooperation, passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The order dated 25.09.2014 passed by the then Minister for Cooperation, Government of Maharashtra, is quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Minister for Cooperation for fresh hearing after giving an opportunity of hearing to all parties. The petitioner's application for transfer of membership shall be considered on its own merits without being influenced by the earlier orders. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • Section 22(2) Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • transfer of membership
  • cooperative society
  • writ jurisdiction under Article 227
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (04) 43

WRIT PETITION NO.10457 OF 2014

2016-04-20

R.M. SAVANT, J.

Mr. V. P. Sawant a/w Mr. S. A. Rajeshirke, Mr. Prabhakar Jadhav, Mr. Rahul Vijaymane, for the Petitioner. Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Kishor Maru, for the Respondent No.4.

Dnyaneshwar @ Dinesh Waman Bhosale

The State of Maharashtra through its Department of Co-operation, Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Assistant Registrar Co-operative Societies, Chairman/Secretary, Parekh Vora Chambers Premises CHS Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Minister for Cooperation, Government of Maharashtra, which allowed the appeal of the society and set aside the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar directing transfer of membership.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the Minister's order dated 25.09.2014 and restoration of the Divisional Joint Registrar's order dated 15.05.2014 directing the society to transfer membership.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's application for transfer of membership was rejected by the society and subsequently by the Deputy Registrar. The Divisional Joint Registrar allowed the appeal, but the Minister for Cooperation set aside that order without hearing the petitioner.

Previous Decisions

Deputy Registrar rejected application on 29.04.2013; Divisional Joint Registrar allowed appeal on 15.05.2014; Minister for Cooperation allowed society's appeal on 25.09.2014.

Issues

Whether the order of the Minister for Cooperation, passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Minister's order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as he was not given an opportunity of hearing. Respondents argued that the Minister had the power to pass the order and that the petitioner's application was not in proper format.

Ratio Decidendi

A quasi-judicial order passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the party directly affected is in breach of principles of natural justice and is unsustainable. The Minister, while exercising revisional powers, must hear the parties before passing an order adverse to them.

Judgment Excerpts

The order passed by the then Minister for Cooperation is in breach of the principles of natural justice in as much as the Petitioner was not given an opportunity of hearing before the said order was passed. The impugned order dated 25.09.2014 passed by the then Minister for Cooperation, Government of Maharashtra is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Minister for Cooperation for a fresh hearing.

Procedural History

The petitioner applied for transfer of membership on 29.12.2011, rejected by society on 11.01.2012. Fresh application on 31.01.2012, no response. Filed application under Section 22(2) before Deputy Registrar, who rejected on 29.04.2013. Appeal to Divisional Joint Registrar allowed on 15.05.2014. Society appealed to Minister for Cooperation, who allowed appeal on 25.09.2014. Petitioner filed writ petition on 25.09.2014. Heard on 20.04.2016 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 22(2)
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Cooperative Society Membership Transfer Dispute — Minister's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Transfer of membership under Section 22(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 can...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, ...