Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction Under Section 307 IPC in Matrimonial Dispute Following Settlement — Power Under Section 482 CrPC Exercised to Secure Ends of Justice. The Court held that where the offence arises out of a matrimonial dispute and the parties have genuinely settled, the High Court may quash proceedings even for non-compoundable offences to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 134
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Ashwini @ Rani Youraj Akurde, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on 2nd June 2012 for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for attempting to murder her husband, the second respondent. She was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six years and a fine of Rs.1,000. She preferred an appeal (Criminal Appeal No.101 of 2012) against the conviction, which was pending before the Sessions Court at Kolhapur. Meanwhile, the husband had filed a divorce petition in the Family Court at Kolhapur. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties amicably resolved their matrimonial dispute and agreed to apply for divorce by mutual consent. The applicant then filed this criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings, including the conviction and sentence. The applicant's counsel argued that since the dispute arose out of a matrimonial relationship and the parties had settled all differences, the High Court should exercise its inherent powers to quash the proceedings to secure the ends of justice, relying on Supreme Court precedents that encourage settlement in matrimonial cases. The State opposed the application, contending that the offence under Section 307 IPC is non-compoundable and serious, and that quashing would set a wrong precedent. The second respondent (husband) supported the application, stating that he had no objection and that the settlement was genuine. The High Court, after considering the submissions and the fact that the parties had settled their matrimonial dispute and were pursuing divorce by mutual consent, held that continuing the criminal proceedings would be futile and would cause further acrimony. The Court noted that the offence arose out of a matrimonial dispute and that the victim had no objection to quashing. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, the Court held that it could quash proceedings even for non-compoundable offences if the settlement is genuine and the chances of conviction are bleak. Accordingly, the Court allowed the application, quashed the conviction and sentence, and set aside the judgment of the trial court. The appeal pending before the Sessions Court was rendered infructuous.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Inherent Powers - Section 482 CrPC - Quashing of Non-Compoundable Offences - Matrimonial Dispute - The Court considered whether proceedings under Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder) can be quashed on the basis of a settlement between husband and wife. Held that where the offence arises out of a matrimonial dispute and the parties have genuinely settled, the High Court may quash proceedings to secure the ends of justice, even if the offence is non-compoundable. (Paras 1-13)

B) Matrimonial Law - Settlement - Divorce by Mutual Consent - The parties had resolved their matrimonial dispute and agreed to apply for divorce by mutual consent, pending before the Family Court. The Court took note of the settlement and the fact that the victim-husband had no objection to quashing. (Paras 3-5)

C) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 IPC - Compromise - The wife was convicted under Section 307 IPC for attempting to kill her husband. The appeal against conviction was pending. The Court held that continuing proceedings would be futile and would cause further acrimony, and quashed the conviction and sentence. (Paras 2, 6-13)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC for an offence under Section 307 IPC (non-compoundable) when the parties have amicably settled their matrimonial dispute.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the application, quashed the conviction and sentence under Section 307 IPC, and set aside the judgment of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kolhapur dated 2nd June 2012. The appeal pending before the Sessions Court was rendered infructuous.

Law Points

  • Section 482 CrPC
  • inherent powers
  • quashing of criminal proceedings
  • matrimonial disputes
  • settlement
  • Section 307 IPC
  • non-compoundable offence
  • compromise
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (03) 94

Criminal Application No.1011 of 2015

2016-03-30

A.S. Oka, P.D. Naik

Mr.Anand Shivaji Patil for Applicant, Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for Respondent no.1, Mr.Abhijeet M. Adagul for Respondent no.2

Sau.Ashwini @ Rani Youraj Akurde

The State of Maharashtra and another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of conviction and sentence under Section 307 IPC arising out of a matrimonial dispute.

Remedy Sought

The applicant-wife sought quashing of the criminal proceedings, including the conviction and sentence, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled their matrimonial dispute.

Filing Reason

The applicant was convicted under Section 307 IPC for attempting to murder her husband. Pending appeal, the parties settled their matrimonial dispute and agreed to divorce by mutual consent.

Previous Decisions

The applicant was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on 2nd June 2012 and sentenced to six years rigorous imprisonment. An appeal against the conviction was pending before the Sessions Court at Kolhapur.

Issues

Whether the High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC for an offence under Section 307 IPC (non-compoundable) when the parties have amicably settled their matrimonial dispute.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel: The offence arose out of a matrimonial dispute and the parties have settled all differences. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that in matrimonial cases, criminal proceedings can be quashed on settlement to secure the ends of justice. State's counsel: The offence under Section 307 IPC is non-compoundable and serious. Quashing would set a wrong precedent and encourage compromise in serious offences.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings even for non-compoundable offences if the offence arises out of a matrimonial dispute and the parties have genuinely settled their differences, as continuing proceedings would be futile and cause further acrimony, and to secure the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The submission of learned counsel for Applicant is that criminal proceedings were initiated as a result of ongoing matrimonial dispute between the Applicant and the second Respondent. He submitted that as there is a complete settlement between the parties to the marriage, this is a fit case to exercise power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the criminal proceedings. The Apex Court has repeatedly held, especially in the case of offences arising out of matrimonial disputes, that an endeavour shall be made by the Courts to ensure that the settlement in the matrimonial disputes is given full effect, if necessary, by quashing the pending criminal proceedings.

Procedural History

The applicant was convicted under Section 307 IPC by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on 2nd June 2012. She appealed to the Sessions Court (Criminal Appeal No.101 of 2012). During the pendency of the appeal, the parties settled their matrimonial dispute and agreed to divorce by mutual consent. The applicant then filed this application under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 307
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction in Bank Guarantee Dispute — Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract Confers Jurisdiction on Chennai Courts. Plaintiff L&T's Suit Challenging Invocation of Performance Bank Guarantee Dismis...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when it discloses a cause of action and raises triable...