Supreme Court Upholds Government Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector Due to Misuse Concerns. Legislative Powers Under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Affirmed as Necessary for Public Health Regulation.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a Notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on 27.04.2018, which restricted the manufacture of Oxytocin formulations for domestic use to public sector companies, while allowing private companies to manufacture for export. This Notification was challenged by various private sector companies before the Delhi High Court, which granted a stay and later quashed the Notification, deeming it arbitrary and unreasonable. The Supreme Court was approached by the Union of India to contest this judgment. The court noted that Oxytocin is an essential drug listed by the WHO and the National List of Essential Medicines, and its regulation was necessary due to concerns over misuse in veterinary practices. The court emphasized that the legislative powers under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act allow the government to regulate drugs in public interest, and that the High Court's review of the government's material was beyond its jurisdiction. Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld the government's Notification, reinforcing the need for stringent regulation of essential medicines to prevent misuse while balancing public health interests.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Legislative Powers - Judicial Review of Legislative Actions - Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - The court examined the extent of judicial review over legislative actions taken by the Central Government under Section 26A, emphasizing the presumption of constitutionality and the limited grounds for review. It held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by questioning the sufficiency of material relied upon by the Central Government (Paras 8-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Validity of the Notification dated 27.04.2018 under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Notification dated 27.04.2018, affirming the government's authority to regulate the manufacture of Oxytocin in the interest of public health and safety.

Law Points

  • Legislative powers
  • Judicial review
  • Public health regulations
  • Essential medicines
  • Drug misuse prevention
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (08) 137

Civil Appeal Nos. 6588-6591 of 2019

2019-12-14

Indu Malhotra

Tushar Mehta, Vikramjeet Banerjee

Union of India

BGP Products Operations GmbH and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the validity of a government notification restricting drug manufacture

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the Notification restricting Oxytocin manufacture

Filing Reason

Alleged arbitrary and unreasonable restriction on drug manufacture

Previous Decisions

Delhi High Court quashed the Notification, stating it lacked scientific basis

Issues

Whether the Notification restricting Oxytocin manufacture is valid under Section 26A Extent of judicial review over legislative actions by the Central Government

Submissions/Arguments

The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reviewing the sufficiency of material relied upon by the Central Government. The Central Government's legislative powers under Section 26A are broad and should not be questioned by the judiciary.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the limited grounds for judicial review over legislative actions and upheld the government's power to regulate essential medicines under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned notification restricts the manufacture of Oxytocin formulations for domestic use, only by public sector undertakings or companies. The Delhi High Court quashed the impugned notification as being arbitrary and unreasonable. The court examined the extent of judicial review over legislative actions taken by the Central Government under Section 26A.

Procedural History

The Delhi High Court granted a stay on the Notification, which was extended until it quashed the Notification on 14.12.2018. The Union of India filed appeals against this judgment, leading to the Supreme Court hearing.

Acts & Sections

  • Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940: Section 26A
  • Essential Commodities Act, 1955:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Final Decree Proceedings in Partition Suit — Court Has Obligation to Draw Up Final Decree After Preliminary Decree. The court held that a preliminary decree does not completely dispose of the suit and the sui...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blacklisting by Railways — Violation of Natural Justice and Unreasoned Order. The court set aside the blacklisting order for being arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice.