Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Inclusion in Surplus List and Salary Arrears — Cancellation of D.Ed. Degree Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that cancellation of educational qualification without hearing is void and directed inclusion in surplus list and payment of arrears.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 89
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Meena d/o Prabhakar Tigote, was appointed as an untrained teacher on 26 June 1995 by the management of Siddarth Prathamik Vidyalaya, Latur, and her appointment was continued through successive appointment orders. She remained in continuous service. The management prepared a surplus list of teachers dated 26 June 2014, but the petitioner was not included. Additionally, the Director of Education (Respondent No.2) passed an order on 31 December 2005 cancelling her D.Ed. degree obtained through postal/correspondence mode. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions to include her in the surplus list, quash the cancellation order, and release her salary arrears from 26 June 1995. The court noted that the cancellation order was passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, thus violating principles of natural justice. The court issued rule and made it returnable forthwith, heard the parties, and reserved judgment. The judgment was pronounced on 4 March 2016. The court allowed the petition, quashed the cancellation order, and directed the respondents to include the petitioner in the surplus list and pay her salary arrears.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Cancellation of Degree - Cancellation of educational qualification without prior notice and opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice - The Director of Education cancelled the petitioner's D.Ed. degree ex parte, which was challenged - Held that such cancellation cannot be sustained as it was passed without hearing the petitioner (Paras 2-3).

B) Education Law - Surplus Teachers - Inclusion in Surplus List - Teacher appointed as untrained and later acquiring D.Ed. degree - Petitioner sought inclusion in surplus list dated 26.6.2014 and salary arrears - Held that the matter requires consideration and rule is issued (Para 2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's D.Ed. degree by the Director of Education without affording an opportunity of hearing is valid, and whether the petitioner is entitled to be included in the surplus list and receive salary arrears.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order dated 31.12.2005 cancelling the petitioner's D.Ed. degree, directed respondent No.4 to include the petitioner in the surplus list dated 26.6.2014, and directed payment of salary arrears from 26.6.1995.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Cancellation of educational qualification without notice
  • Surplus teacher list
  • Salary arrears
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (03) 4

WRIT PETITION NO. 7680 OF 2014

2016-03-04

S.S. Shinde, P.R. Bora

Mr. R.D. Biradar, Mr. S.D. Kaldate, Mr. U.B. Bondar, Mr. A.S. Shejwal

Meena d/o Prabhakar Tigote

The State of Maharashtra, The Director of Education, The Deputy Director of Education, The Education Officer (Primary), Samta Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, The Head Master

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of D.Ed. degree and seeking inclusion in surplus list and salary arrears.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to include her in surplus list dated 26.6.2014, quash order dated 31.12.2005 cancelling her D.Ed. degree, and release salary arrears from 26.6.1995.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's D.Ed. degree was cancelled ex parte by the Director of Education, and she was not included in the surplus list of teachers, leading to non-payment of salary.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 31.12.2005 by Director of Education cancelling petitioner's D.Ed. degree.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's D.Ed. degree without affording an opportunity of hearing is valid? Whether the petitioner is entitled to be included in the surplus list and receive salary arrears?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the cancellation order was passed without notice and in violation of natural justice. Respondents argued in support of the cancellation order.

Ratio Decidendi

Cancellation of an educational qualification without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

The brief facts leading for filing this Writ Petition are that, the petitioner was appointed as untrained teacher on 26.6.1995... Respondent No.4 be directed to include the petitioner in surplus list of teachers dated 26.6.2014...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 7680 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) challenging the cancellation order and seeking inclusion in surplus list. The court issued rule, heard the parties, and pronounced judgment on 4 March 2016.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Inclusion in Surplus List and Salary Arrears — Cancellation of D.Ed. Degree Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that cancellation of educational qualification without hearing is...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Default in Rent Payment Under Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act. Tenants Failed to Pay Arrears Within One Month of Demand Notice and Did Not Apply for Standard Rent ...