Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Demand Notices in Water Resource Department Recovery Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Recovery Proceedings Under Section 202 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 Must Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Issuing Demand.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 91
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Hema Myer Sood, sole proprietor of M/s Popular Construction Company, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging two demand notices issued by the Revenue Recovery Officer (respondent no. 2). The first notice dated 8.5.2015 demanded Rs. 6,42,827/- and the second notice dated 15.10.2015 demanded Rs. 11,00,000/-. The petitioner contended that the notices were issued without any prior opportunity of hearing and in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents argued that the recovery was for dues payable to the Water Resource Department and that proper procedure was followed. The court, after hearing both sides, observed that the recovery proceedings under Section 202 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 must adhere to principles of natural justice. Since no opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner before issuing the demand notices, the court held that the notices were unsustainable. The court quashed both demand notices and directed the respondents to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before taking any further recovery action. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Opportunity of Hearing - Demand notices under Section 202 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 - The petitioner challenged demand notices issued without prior hearing - Court held that recovery proceedings must comply with principles of natural justice and provide adequate opportunity of hearing before issuing demand - Notices quashed (Paras 5-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the demand notices issued by the Revenue Recovery Officer without providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner are sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the demand notices dated 8.5.2015 and 15.10.2015 and directed the respondents to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before taking any further recovery action. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • recovery of government dues
  • Section 202 Goa Land Revenue Code
  • 1968
  • quashing of demand notices
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (01) 166

WRIT PETITION NO. 43 OF 2016

2016-01-20

F. M. REIS, K. L. Wadane

2016:BHC-GOA:124-DB

Mr. B. Khandeparkar (for petitioner), Ms. S. Linhares (for respondents)

Mrs. Hema Myer Sood

The Executive Engineer, Works Division XIII, Water Resource Department; The Revenue Recovery Officer; State of Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging demand notices issued by Revenue Recovery Officer for recovery of government dues.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of demand notices dated 8.5.2015 and 15.10.2015.

Filing Reason

Demand notices were issued without providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Issues

Whether the demand notices issued without opportunity of hearing are valid? Whether recovery proceedings under Section 202 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 require compliance with principles of natural justice?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that demand notices were issued without any prior hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents contended that proper procedure was followed and recovery was for legitimate government dues.

Ratio Decidendi

Recovery proceedings under Section 202 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 must comply with principles of natural justice, and a demand notice cannot be issued without providing an opportunity of hearing to the person from whom recovery is sought.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking to quash the demand notice dated 8.5.2015 issued by the respondent no. 2 thereby demanding an amount of Rs. 6,42,827/- and another notice dated 15.10.2015 demanding Rs. 11,00,000/-. The recovery proceedings under Section 202 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 must adhere to principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging two demand notices. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 19th January 2016, pronouncing it on 20th January 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968: Section 202
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Dying Declaration and Recovery of Firearm. Dying declaration made to wife and brother held reliable despite absence of medical corroboration.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Demand Notices in Water Resource Department Recovery Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Recovery Proceedings Under Section 202 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 Must Provide Opportunity of Hearing ...