Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Denying Daily Wages to Deceased Employee. Unilateral stoppage of sanctioned daily wages without notice or hearing is arbitrary and violative of natural justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 49
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shaikh Ali Ahmed, was appointed as an Electrician on daily wages in August 1985 by the Irrigation Department of Maharashtra. However, the department designated him as a Pump Operator and paid him daily wages admissible to that post, which were lower. Upon his grievance, the Superintending Engineer by letter dated 20.11.1991 approved the proposal for grant of daily wages of the post of Electrician, and the Executive Engineer sanctioned the same with effect from 1st June 1991. Subsequently, the authorities stopped paying the daily wages of Electrician without any notice or opportunity of hearing. The petitioner filed Original Application No.376/2008 before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, which dismissed it on 30.08.2013. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The High Court observed that the respondents had not issued any notice or given any opportunity of hearing before stopping the sanctioned wages. The Court held that the action of the respondents was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The Court set aside the Tribunal's order and directed the respondents to pay the petitioner daily wages of the post of Electrician from the date they were stopped until his death, within three months. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Daily Wages - Unilateral Reduction - The petitioner was appointed as Electrician on daily wages but was designated as Pump Operator and paid lower wages. After grievance, the authorities sanctioned daily wages of Electrician from 1st June 1991. Subsequently, the authorities stopped those wages without any notice or hearing. The Court held that once wages of a higher post are sanctioned and paid, they cannot be unilaterally stopped without following due process. The impugned order of the Tribunal was set aside and the respondents were directed to pay daily wages of Electrician from the date they were stopped till the petitioner's death. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent authorities could unilaterally stop the daily wages of the post of Electrician which were sanctioned and paid to the petitioner, without any notice or opportunity of hearing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 30.08.2013, and directed the respondents to pay the petitioner daily wages of the post of Electrician from the date they were stopped until his death, within three months.

Law Points

  • Daily wages cannot be unilaterally reduced without notice or hearing
  • Principle of legitimate expectation
  • Government must act fairly and reasonably
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (09) 20

Writ Petition No.10452 of 2014

2015-09-22

S.S.Shinde, P.R.Bora

Mr. A.S.Shelke for Petitioner, Mr. S.K.Kadam AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2, Mr. S.C.Arora for Respondent Nos.3 to 5

Shaikh Ali Ahmed (deceased through L.Rs.)

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dismissing the original application seeking restoration of daily wages of the post of Electrician.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the Tribunal's order and direction to the respondents to pay daily wages of the post of Electrician from the date they were stopped.

Filing Reason

The respondent authorities stopped the daily wages of the post of Electrician which were sanctioned and paid to the petitioner, without any notice or opportunity of hearing.

Previous Decisions

The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Bench at Aurangabad, by judgment and order dated 30.08.2013, dismissed Original Application No.376/2008 filed by the petitioner.

Issues

Whether the respondent authorities could unilaterally stop the daily wages of the post of Electrician which were sanctioned and paid to the petitioner, without any notice or opportunity of hearing.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the daily wages of Electrician were sanctioned and paid, and the respondents could not stop them without any notice or hearing. The respondents contended that the petitioner was initially appointed as Pump Operator and was paid accordingly, and the sanction of Electrician wages was a mistake.

Ratio Decidendi

Once daily wages of a higher post are sanctioned and paid to an employee, the authorities cannot unilaterally stop such wages without issuing any notice or giving an opportunity of hearing, as it would be arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

It is the case of the petitioner that, he was appointed as Electrician on daily wages since August, 1985. The respondent authorities, subsequently, stopped daily wages of the post of Electrician. The respondents have not issued any notice or given any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before stopping the daily wages of the post of Electrician.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Original Application No.376/2008 before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Bench at Aurangabad, which was dismissed on 30.08.2013. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No.10452 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, which was allowed on 22.09.2015.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Denying Daily Wages to Deceased Employee. Unilateral stoppage of sanctioned daily wages without notice or hearing is arbitrary and violative of natural justice.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Gymkhana Against Interim Stay on Membership Cancellation. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Interfere When Club Decision Violates Natural Justice or Is Mala Fide.