Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Tractor Owner and Driver Held Liable for Compensation Despite Insurance Company's Exoneration. Deceased was a Gratuitous Passenger in Tractor Trolley, Not Covered by Insurance Policy; Owner and Driver Liable to Pay Compensation with Interest.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of Bhanudas Kisan Goswami, who died in a tractor-trolley accident on 26 April 2002. The deceased, a labourer, was travelling as a passenger in a tractor trolley driven by Bhagwat Gosuji Dongarwar, owned by Gosuji Waktuji Dongarwar. The tractor was insured with the National Insurance Company Ltd. The claimants sought compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhandara, held that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the tractor driver, and awarded compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of petition till realization, including no fault liability under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The tribunal exonerated the insurance company on the ground that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger, not covered under the insurance policy. The owner and driver appealed against the award, primarily challenging the quantum of compensation and the exoneration of the insurance company. The High Court, after considering the evidence and arguments, upheld the finding of negligence and the quantum of compensation. However, it modified the award by directing the insurance company to pay the compensation to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner, following the principle of 'pay and recover' as laid down in various Supreme Court judgments. The court noted that the tractor was insured and the accident occurred during the use of the vehicle, and thus the insurance company should not be completely exonerated. The appeal was partly allowed, with the insurance company directed to pay the compensation and then recover from the owner.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Gratuitous Passenger - Liability of Owner and Driver - The appeal challenged the award of compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhandara, which held the appellants (owner and driver) liable to pay compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest at 9% p.a. for the death of Bhanudas, who fell from a tractor trolley due to rash and negligent driving. The insurance company was exonerated on the ground that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger, not covered under the policy. The High Court upheld the finding of negligence and the quantum of compensation, but modified the award to direct the insurance company to pay the compensation and then recover from the owner, as the tractor was insured and the accident occurred during its use. (Paras 1-10)

B) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 147 - Insurance Policy - Gratuitous Passenger - The court held that a gratuitous passenger in a tractor trolley is not a third party and is not covered under the insurance policy. However, following the principle of 'pay and recover', the insurance company was directed to pay the compensation to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner of the vehicle. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the owner and driver of a tractor-trolley are liable to pay compensation for the death of a gratuitous passenger, and whether the insurance company is liable to indemnify the owner when the deceased was not a third party but a gratuitous passenger.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The judgment and order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhandara, dated 29.12.2005, is modified. The insurance company is directed to pay the compensation amount of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of petition till realization to the claimants, and thereafter recover the same from the owner of the tractor (appellant no.1). The award against the driver (appellant no.2) is set aside.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 140
  • Section 166
  • Section 147
  • Gratuitous passenger
  • No fault liability
  • Vicarious liability
  • Negligence
  • Contributory negligence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 160

First Appeal No.267 of 2005

2015-08-13

A.P. Bhangale, J.

Mr. R.D. Bhuibhar for the Appellants, Mr. N.H. Shams for Respondent No.5

Gosuji s/o. Waktuji Dongarwar and Bhagwat s/o. Gosuji Dongarwar

Smt. Lalita wd/o. Bhaudas Goswami, Master Ajay s/o. Bhanudas Goswami, Miss Pallavi d/o. Bhaudas Goswami, Kisan s/o. Juga Goswami, and The National Insurance Company Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding compensation for death in a motor accident.

Remedy Sought

Appellants (owner and driver) sought to challenge the award of compensation and exoneration of insurance company.

Filing Reason

The appellants were held liable to pay compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest, and the insurance company was exonerated.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhandara, in M.A.C.P. No.154 of 2002, awarded compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest at 9% p.a. against the appellants and exonerated the insurance company.

Issues

Whether the finding of negligence against the driver is correct? Whether the quantum of compensation is excessive? Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the accident was not due to negligence of the driver, and the quantum of compensation is excessive. Insurance company argued that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger, not covered under the policy, and thus not liable.

Ratio Decidendi

The owner of a vehicle is vicariously liable for the negligence of the driver. However, when the vehicle is insured, the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to third parties. A gratuitous passenger in a tractor trolley is not a third party and is not covered under the insurance policy. Nevertheless, following the principle of 'pay and recover', the insurance company must pay the compensation to the claimants and then recover from the owner.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appeal questions validity and legality of the Judgment and Order dt.29.12.2005 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhandara in M.A.C.P. No.154 of 2002. Compensation was claimed in the sum of Rs. two Lakhs. It was ordered to be paid by respondents nos.1 to 4 (appellants herein) together with interest at the rate of Rs.9% p.a. from the date of the petition till realisation inclusive of the ‘no fault liability’ under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Respondent no.5/Insurance company was exonerated.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhandara, passed judgment and order on 29.12.2005 in M.A.C.P. No.154 of 2002, awarding compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest at 9% p.a. against the owner and driver (appellants) and exonerating the insurance company. The appellants filed First Appeal No.267 of 2005 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the award. The High Court reserved judgment on 27.7.2015 and pronounced on 13.8.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 140, Section 147, Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Grievous Hurt in Road Accident — Evidence of Eye Witnesses and Spot Panchanama Sufficient to Prove Negligence.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by State-Owned Corporation in Tender Dispute — Fresh Tender Process Upheld Over Consortium's Challenge. Court holds that a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to compel acceptance of a tender when the tender proc...