Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Custodial Death in Central Jail Beed — State and Jail Officials Held Liable for Unnatural Death of Prisoner Due to Head Injury. The court held that the State is vicariously liable for the acts of its servants and awarded Rs.5,00,000 compensation with interest for violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 118
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Asha Sable (wife) and minor children of Namdeo Sable, filed a criminal writ petition seeking compensation of Rs.5,00,000 for the custodial death of Namdeo, who died on 28.3.2009 while lodged in Central Jail, Beed. Namdeo had been arrested on 15.3.2009 pursuant to orders in R.C.C. No.320/2002 and was sent to judicial custody. He died due to a head injury suffered in jail. The petitioners claimed that the death was unnatural and due to the negligence of jail authorities. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and jail officials, contested the claim. The court, after considering the facts and circumstances, held that the State is vicariously liable for the acts of its servants and that the custodial death amounted to a violation of the deceased's right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court awarded compensation of Rs.5,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization, and directed the State to recover the amount from the erring officials.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - Custodial Death - Compensation - Article 21 of Constitution of India - The petitioners, wife and minor children of deceased Namdeo Sable, sought compensation of Rs.5,00,000 for his unnatural death in Central Jail, Beed due to head injury. The court held that the State is vicariously liable for the acts of its servants and awarded compensation of Rs.5,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Law - Custodial Death - Liability of Jail Officials - The court found that the deceased died due to head injury while in custody, and the jail officials failed to protect his life. The court directed the State to pay compensation and recover the same from the erring officials. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to compensation for the custodial death of Namdeo Sable, and whether the State and jail officials are liable for the same.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to pay compensation of Rs.5,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization. The State was directed to recover the amount from the erring officials.

Law Points

  • Custodial death
  • State liability for compensation
  • Vicarious liability of State for acts of its servants
  • Right to life under Article 21 of Constitution of India
  • Compensation for violation of fundamental rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (07) 49

Criminal Writ Petition No.657 of 2009

2015-07-14

S.S. Shinde, A.I.S. Cheema

Shri R.K. Ashtekar for petitioner, Shri S.D. Kaldate A.P.P. for respondents No.1 to 4, Shri B.R. Warma for respondents No.5 to 7, Shri A.S. Barlota for respondent No.7

Asha w/o Namdeo Sable, Shravani d/o Namdeo Sable, Sanitka d/o Namdeo Sable, Krishna s/o Namdeo Sable

The State of Maharashtra, The Inspector General of Prison, The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, The Superintendent of Prison, Dattatraya Devrao Sonone, Ramesh Tarachand Devre, Babusing Devrao Solunke

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking compensation for custodial death

Remedy Sought

Compensation of Rs.5,00,000 for the death of Namdeo Sable while in judicial custody

Filing Reason

Unnatural death of husband/father due to head injury in Central Jail, Beed

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to compensation for the custodial death of Namdeo Sable? Whether the State and jail officials are liable for the death?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that deceased died due to head injury while in custody, and jail authorities were negligent. Respondents contested the claim, but details not provided in text.

Ratio Decidendi

The State is vicariously liable for the acts of its servants, and custodial death amounts to violation of Article 21 of the Constitution, entitling the dependents to compensation.

Judgment Excerpts

Namdeo Vaijnath Sable, the husband of petitioner No.1 died unnatural death on 28.3.2009 when he was lodged in the Central Jail, Beed. The petitioners claim that, deceased Namdeo died due to head injury suffered by him while he was lodged in the Central Jail, Beed.

Procedural History

The petition was filed on an unspecified date, reserved for judgment on 30/6/2015, and pronounced on 14/7/2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows PIL Challenging MCI's Rejection of PG Seat Increase Applications for Lack of Consent of Affiliation. The court held that the requirement of Consent of Affiliation is directory and not mandatory, and that the MCI ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Custodial Death in Central Jail Beed — State and Jail Officials Held Liable for Unnatural Death of Prisoner Due to Head Injury. The court held that the State is vicariously liable for the acts of its servan...