High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Co-operative Society's Tax Appeals — Primary Co-operative Bank Excluded from Section 80P Deduction. Appellant's claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) denied as it is a Primary Co-operative Bank hit by Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 77
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves three tax appeals filed by M/s. The Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 26 November 2014, which held that the appellant is a primary co-operative bank and thus not entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by virtue of the exclusion under Section 80P(4). The appellant, a co-operative society registered under the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, filed returns for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2011-12, claiming deduction of its entire income under Section 80P(2)(a)(i), resulting in nil taxable income. The Assessing Officer, by order dated 14 February 2014, disallowed the claim on the ground that the appellant is a primary co-operative bank and therefore hit by Section 80P(4). The appellant appealed to the CIT(A), who allowed the appeal on 15 July 2014, holding that the appellant is a co-operative credit society, not a co-operative bank. The Revenue appealed to the Tribunal, which reversed the CIT(A)'s order and restored the Assessing Officer's order. The High Court admitted the appeals on 25 March 2014 on the substantial question of law regarding the applicability of Section 80P(4). The court noted that the controversy was narrow and disposed of the appeals. The court examined the definition of 'primary co-operative bank' under Section 5(ccv) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and found that the appellant satisfies the conditions: it is a co-operative society, its primary object is providing credit facilities to its members, and it is licensed by the Reserve Bank of India. The court held that the appellant is a primary co-operative bank and thus excluded from the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) by Section 80P(4). The court dismissed all three appeals, answering the question of law in favor of the Revenue.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Deduction under Section 80P - Co-operative Bank Exclusion - Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - The appellant, a co-operative society registered under the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for its entire income. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim holding that the appellant is a primary co-operative bank and thus excluded by Section 80P(4). The CIT(A) allowed the appeal, but the Tribunal reversed, holding that the appellant is a co-operative bank. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, finding that the appellant is a primary co-operative bank as defined under Section 5(ccv) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and therefore not entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) due to the exclusion in Section 80P(4). Held that the appellant is a co-operative bank and not entitled to deduction (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant, a co-operative society registered under the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, is a co-operative bank and thus not entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) by virtue of Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed all three appeals, answering the substantial question of law in favor of the Revenue and against the appellant. The court held that the appellant is a primary co-operative bank and therefore not entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) by virtue of Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Law Points

  • Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act
  • 1961 excludes co-operative banks from deduction under Section 80P
  • Section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction not available to primary co-operative banks
  • definition of primary co-operative bank under Section 5(ccv) of the Banking Regulation Act
  • 1949 applies for Section 80P(4) purposes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (04) 119

Tax Appeals No. 22, 23 & 24 of 2015

2015-04-17

F. M. REIS, M. S. SANKLECHA

Chythanya K. K., Shailesh Redkar, Asha Dessai

M/s. The Quepem Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd.

The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Circle 1

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Tax appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which held that the appellant is a primary co-operative bank and not entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to set aside the Tribunal's order and restore the CIT(A)'s order allowing deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Filing Reason

The appellant was aggrieved by the Tribunal's order dated 26 November 2014 which reversed the CIT(A)'s order and held that the appellant is a primary co-operative bank excluded from deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) by Section 80P(4).

Previous Decisions

The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction on 14 February 2014; the CIT(A) allowed the appeal on 15 July 2014; the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A) on 26 November 2014.

Issues

Whether the appellant is a co-operative bank within the meaning of Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and thus not entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that it is a co-operative credit society, not a co-operative bank, and therefore entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The respondent argued that the appellant is a primary co-operative bank as defined under Section 5(ccv) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and thus excluded by Section 80P(4).

Ratio Decidendi

A co-operative society which satisfies the definition of a 'primary co-operative bank' under Section 5(ccv) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, is excluded from the benefit of deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by virtue of Section 80P(4). The appellant, being a co-operative society with the primary object of providing credit facilities to its members and licensed by the RBI, is a primary co-operative bank and thus not entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Judgment Excerpts

the Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal holding that the appellant is not entitled to the benefit of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, as it is a Primary Co-operative Bank, thus hit by the exclusion provided in Section 80P(4) of the Act. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Tribunal was right in law in holding that the Appellant is a Co-operative Bank and hence, it is not entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) by virtue of Section 80P(4) of the Act ?

Procedural History

The appellant filed returns for assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2011-12 claiming deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim on 14 February 2014. The appellant appealed to the CIT(A), who allowed the appeal on 15 July 2014. The Revenue appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which reversed the CIT(A) on 26 November 2014. The appellant then filed three tax appeals under Section 260A of the Act before the High Court, which were admitted on 25 March 2014 and disposed of on 17 April 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 80P, Section 80P(2)(a)(i), Section 80P(4), Section 260A, Section 143
  • Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001:
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949: Section 5(ccv)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Filed by Newspaper Publisher Against Advertising Agency for Unpaid Bills. Court Decrees Suit for Principal Amount with Interest at 6% Per Annum.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation to Pay Arrears of Pay Difference to Employee in Permanency Benefits Case. Corporation Agrees to Pay Differential Amount as Per Rejoinder Affidavit, Failing Which Interest at 6% Per Annum Will...