Bombay High Court Quashes Education Officer's Order Cancelling Approval of Shikshan Sevak Appointments in Urdu Primary School — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Opportunity of Hearing. The court held that cancellation of approval without hearing the affected parties is violative of principles of natural justice and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Syed Mateen and Shaikh Irshad, were appointed as Shikshan Sevak in Urdu Primary School, Dharmabad, following a selection process initiated after two Assistant Teachers retired on 31.5.2012. The Headmaster sought permission to advertise the vacancies, and after advertisement, the petitioners applied and were selected. They were appointed on 13.8.2012 and joined service on 16.8.2012. The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded, granted approval to their appointments on 18.9.2013. However, on 10.11.2014, the Education Officer passed an order cancelling the approval without issuing any show cause notice or affording the petitioners an opportunity of hearing. The petitioners challenged this order by way of a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice as the petitioners were not given any opportunity to be heard before the cancellation. The court set aside the order and remitted the matter back to the Education Officer to decide the issue afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the school management. The court directed that the petitioners shall continue to work as Shikshan Sevak until the fresh decision is taken, and the Education Officer was directed to decide the matter within four months from the date of the order.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Cancellation of Approval - Opportunity of Hearing - The Education Officer cancelled the approval granted to the petitioners' appointments without issuing any show cause notice or giving them an opportunity of hearing - Held that such cancellation without hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and the impugned order is liable to be quashed (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Education Officer could cancel the approval granted to the appointment of the petitioners as Shikshan Sevak without affording them an opportunity of hearing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 10.11.2014 is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded to decide the issue afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the school management. The petitioners shall continue to work as Shikshan Sevak until the fresh decision is taken. The Education Officer is directed to decide the matter within four months from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • cancellation of approval without notice
  • violation of principles of natural justice
  • quashing of order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (04) 16

WRIT PETITION NO.10832 of 2014

2015-04-28

S.S. Shinde, P.R. Bora

Mr. Vivek J. Dhage for petitioners, Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil for respondent State, Mr. Y.P. Pawar for respondent nos. 4 and 5, Mr. R.K. Ingole Patil for respondent no.3

Syed Mateen s/o Syed Yousuf and Shaikh Irshad Shaikh Musa

The State of Maharashtra, Deputy Director of Education, Education Officer (Primary), Urdu Education Society, and Urdu Primary School

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Education Officer cancelling approval of appointment of petitioners as Shikshan Sevak.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 10.11.2014 passed by the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded.

Filing Reason

The Education Officer cancelled the approval granted to the petitioners' appointments without giving them an opportunity of hearing.

Previous Decisions

The Education Officer had initially granted approval to the appointments on 18.9.2013, but later cancelled it on 10.11.2014.

Issues

Whether the impugned order cancelling approval was passed in violation of principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the impugned order was passed without giving them any opportunity of hearing, thus violating principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

An order cancelling approval of appointment without affording an opportunity of hearing to the affected parties is violative of the principles of natural justice and is liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order is passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The impugned order is quashed and set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Education Officer to decide the issue afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the school management.

Procedural History

The petitioners were appointed as Shikshan Sevak on 13.8.2012 and joined on 16.8.2012. The Education Officer granted approval on 18.9.2013. On 10.11.2014, the Education Officer cancelled the approval. The petitioners filed the present writ petition challenging the cancellation order.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Education Officer's Order Cancelling Approval of Shikshan Sevak Appointments in Urdu Primary School — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Opportunity of Hearing. The court held that cancellation of approval without he...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Article 227 as Arbitrator's Findings Are Not Perverse or Contrary to Law. The court upheld the arbitral award and the app...