Supreme Court Disposed of Contempt Petitions Against West Bengal Government for Alleged Non-Compliance with Salary Payment Directions to Part-Time Contractual Teachers -- No Willful Breach Established in Implementation of High Court Judgment

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Gurupada Bera and others against Binod Kumar and others (representing the State of West Bengal) alleging non-compliance with court directions regarding payment of salary arrears to part-time contractual teachers. The Court found that the respondents had substantially complied with the directions by disbursing arrears for the specified period (28th July, 2010 to 24th December, 2013) and were processing representations for other periods. The Court held that no wilful breach was established and disposed of the petitions with directions to consider the representations and submissions advanced by the petitioners

Headnote

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971-- Batch of four contempt petitions-- petitions for alleged breach of directions-- Contractual teachers-- Arrears of salary-- Non-compliance of directions issued by the court-- Dispute with regard to pay scale to teachers-- Directions was issued requiring part-time contractual teachers to submit representation before Secretary, School Education Department to justify their claims-- Allegations of breach of orders-- No wilful breach asserted by respondent-- Case of the petitioners that they were not afforded opportunity of hearing-- Respondent side fairly conceded that the petitioners were not granted an opportunity of hearing in terms of directions issued by high court-- Liberty granted to the petitioners to submit a fresh representation before Secretary, School Education department within stipulated time limit-- Directions issued to the Secretary to afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners in representative capacity-- Directions to pass a detailed reasoned order after considering the representations and submissions advanced within four months-- Contempt petitions disposed of

Issue of Consideration: Whether the respondent-contemnors committed contempt of court by wilfully disobeying the directions issued by the Supreme Court in its order dated 16th July, 2024, and the High Court judgment dated 3rd September, 2020, regarding payment of salary arrears to part-time contractual teachers

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed all four contempt petitions, holding that no wilful breach of court orders was established. The Court found that the respondents had substantially complied with the directions and were processing remaining claims through proper channels.

2026 LawText (SC) (01) 17

CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). OF 2026 (DIARY NO(S). 18826 OF 2025) IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (Civil) No (s). 14355 of 2021 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). OF 2026 (DIARY NO(S). 20310/2025) IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (Civil) No (s). 2809 of 2021 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). OF 2026 (DIARY NO(S). 23548/2025) IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (Civil) No (s). 2809 of 2021 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). OF 2026 (DIARY NO(S). 24482/2025) IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (Civil) No (s). 2809 of 2021

2026-01-06

VIKRAM NATH J. , SANDEEP MEHTA J.

2026 INSC 20

Shri Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent-contemnors

Gurupada Bera & Ors.

Binod Kumar & Ors.

Nature of Litigation: Contempt petitions alleging non-compliance with Supreme Court and High Court directions regarding payment of salary arrears to part-time contractual teachers

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought contempt action against respondents for alleged wilful disobedience of court orders

Filing Reason

Alleged failure to extend relief granted by High Court and affirmed by Supreme Court to similarly placed teachers

Previous Decisions

High Court judgment dated 3rd September, 2020 directed payment of salary arrears -- Supreme Court order dated 16th July, 2024 directed compliance within three months and extension of relief to all similarly placed respondents

Issues

Whether the respondent-contemnors committed contempt by wilfully disobeying court directions regarding payment of salary arrears to part-time contractual teachers

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners alleged non-compliance with specific directions for salary payment -- Respondents asserted arrears for 2010-2013 period had been disbursed and no wilful breach occurred -- Petitioners contended representations for other periods were not properly considered

Ratio Decidendi

Civil contempt requires proof of wilful disobedience of court orders -- Courts exercise contempt jurisdiction cautiously and sparingly -- Substantial compliance with directions may not constitute contempt even if technical issues remain -- Petitioners must establish clear and deliberate breach for contempt to be made out

Judgment Excerpts

"Having regard to the fact that the impugned judgment was passed on 03rd September, 2020 and the same has remained stayed... it is deemed appropriate to direct the State Government of West Bengal to make compliances of the impugned judgment within a period of three months from today" -- "The respondent-contemnors have pleaded that the arrears/dues payable to the petitioners for the period from 28th July, 2010 to 24th December, 2013, stand duly disbursed" -- "No wilful breach of the order passed by this Court dated 16th July, 2024, or of the judgment dated 3rd September, 2020, rendered by the Division Bench of the High Court, has been committed"

Procedural History

High Court judgment dated 3rd September, 2020 directed payment of salary arrears -- Supreme Court stayed the judgment in 2021 -- Supreme Court order dated 16th July, 2024 directed compliance within three months -- Contempt petitions filed alleging non-compliance -- Common reply filed by respondents asserting compliance -- Supreme Court heard arguments and dismissed petitions

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Disposed of Contempt Petitions Against West Bengal Government for Alleged Non-Compliance with Salary Payment Directions to Part-Time Contractual Teachers -- No Willful Breach Established in Implementation of High Court Judgment
Related Judgement
High Court Denial of Approval for Open Distance Learning and Online Programmes Quashed Due to Violation of Natural Justice