Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of First Informant in Section 169 CrPC Discharge Case — Magistrate's Order Set Aside for Denial of Hearing. The first informant is entitled to notice and hearing before the Magistrate accepts a police report under Section 169 CrPC discharging the accused, as per the principle in Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 51
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Maroti S/o Kaluba More, filed a First Information Report (FIR No. 159/2000) with the Kandhar police station in Nanded district. The Investigating Officer submitted a report under Section 169 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) recommending discharge of the accused persons. The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kandhar, accepted the report and discharged the accused by order dated 24/06/2002 without issuing any prior notice or affording an opportunity of hearing to the applicant, who was the first informant. Aggrieved, the applicant filed a Criminal Revision Application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the order on the ground of denial of natural justice. The applicant's counsel argued that the Magistrate was bound to give notice and hear the first informant before accepting the Section 169 report, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police, AIR 1985 SC 1285. The State respondents opposed the application. The High Court framed the issue as whether the first informant is entitled to notice and hearing before the Magistrate accepts a report under Section 169 CrPC. The Court noted that a similar question was considered by the Gujarat High Court in Special Criminal Application No. 334 of 2002. The Court held that the principle in Bhagwant Singh applies to Section 169 reports, and the Magistrate must give notice to the first informant before accepting such a report. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Magistrate for fresh consideration after giving notice and hearing to the applicant. The Criminal Revision Application was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Right of Hearing - First Informant - Section 169, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The first informant is entitled to notice and an opportunity of hearing before the Magistrate accepts a police report under Section 169 CrPC discharging the accused. The Magistrate's order without such notice violates principles of natural justice. (Paras 4-6)

B) Criminal Procedure - Precedent - Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police - AIR 1985 SC 1285 - The principle laid down in Bhagwant Singh applies to reports under Section 169 CrPC, requiring the Magistrate to give notice to the first informant before accepting the report. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the first informant is entitled to notice and hearing before the Magistrate accepts a police report under Section 169 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 discharging the accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Criminal Revision Application is allowed. The impugned order dated 24/06/2002 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kandhar, is set aside. The matter is remanded to the learned Magistrate for fresh consideration after giving notice and opportunity of hearing to the applicant. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Right of hearing
  • Natural justice
  • Section 169 CrPC
  • First informant
  • Notice before discharge
  • Bhagwant Singh case
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (02) 7

Criminal Revision Application No. 205 of 2002

2015-02-04

V.M. Deshpande, J.

Mr. Sk.S.A.R. Ahmed h/f Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar for the Applicant, Mr. V.P. Kadam, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 State

Maroti S/o Kaluba More

The State of Maharashtra, The Superintendent of Police Nanded, The Police Station Incharge/P.S.O., Police Station, Kandhar, Dist. Nanded

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Revision Application challenging the order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class accepting a police report under Section 169 CrPC and discharging the accused without notice to the first informant.

Remedy Sought

The applicant/first informant sought to set aside the Magistrate's order dated 24/06/2002 discharging the accused and sought a direction for fresh consideration after giving him an opportunity of hearing.

Filing Reason

The Magistrate accepted the police report under Section 169 CrPC and discharged the accused without issuing prior notice or hearing the first informant, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kandhar, passed the order dated 24/06/2002 in FIR No. 159/2000 discharging the accused.

Issues

Whether the first informant is entitled to notice and hearing before the Magistrate accepts a police report under Section 169 CrPC discharging the accused.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant's counsel submitted that no prior notice was given to the applicant and the Magistrate accepted the Section 169 report without hearing him, relying on Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police, AIR 1985 SC 1285. The State respondents opposed the application through the learned A.P.P.

Ratio Decidendi

The first informant is entitled to notice and an opportunity of hearing before the Magistrate accepts a police report under Section 169 CrPC discharging the accused. The principle laid down in Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police applies to such reports, and failure to give notice violates natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The principal challenge against the said order is the denial of the opportunity of hearing to the applicant. The question, which is posed before this Court for determination, is ' as to whether the first informant is entitled to notice and whether he is required to be heard by the learned Magistrate before he accepts the report submitted by the Investigating Officer in respect of his action taken u/s 169 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ' ?

Procedural History

The applicant filed FIR No. 159/2000. The Investigating Officer submitted a report under Section 169 CrPC. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kandhar, accepted the report and discharged the accused by order dated 24/06/2002 without notice to the applicant. The applicant filed Criminal Revision Application No. 205 of 2002 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, which was heard and allowed on 04/02/2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 169
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous After Final Decree in Suit. Supreme Court dismisses appeal against High Court order due to subsequent final decree in the suit, rendering the appeal moot.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of First Informant in Section 169 CrPC Discharge Case — Magistrate's Order Set Aside for Denial of Hearing. The first informant is entitled to notice and hearing before the Magistrate accepts a police r...