Bombay High Court Allows Goshala's Petition for Custody of Seized Animals in Cruelty Case — Magistrate's Order Releasing Animals to Accused Quashed. The Court held that a registered goshala is a suitable entity for interim custody under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, and the Magistrate must consider the object of the Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 121
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sarvodaya Goshala Charitable Trust, a registered goshala, filed four criminal writ petitions challenging an order dated 22/9/2014 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Wardha in Misc. Criminal Application No. 453 of 2014 arising out of Crime No. 3068 of 2014. The crime was registered for offences under Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 read with Section 119 of the Bombay Police Act and Sections 83 and 177 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The Magistrate had released the custody of 13 she-buffaloes to respondent No. 2, one of the accused persons. The petitioner trust, through its President Vasant Annaji Panchbhai, contended that the Magistrate erred in releasing the animals to the accused without considering that the trust was a registered goshala willing to take custody and provide proper care. The State of Maharashtra and the accused respondents opposed the petitions. The High Court, presided by Justice S. B. Shukre, heard the matter and allowed the petitions, quashing the Magistrate's order. The Court held that the Magistrate failed to appreciate the object of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, which aims to prevent cruelty and ensure welfare of animals. The Court directed that the custody of the 13 she-buffaloes be given to the petitioner trust, subject to conditions including producing the animals before the trial court as required, not transferring them outside the jurisdiction, and maintaining proper records. The Court also directed the trial court to expedite the trial.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Interim Custody of Seized Animals - Section 451, 457 CrPC - Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - The Magistrate released 13 she-buffaloes to the accused despite the petitioner trust being a registered goshala willing to take custody - The High Court held that the Magistrate failed to consider the object of the Act and the suitability of the trust, and directed custody to be given to the petitioner trust subject to conditions (Paras 3-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Magistrate was correct in releasing the custody of seized she-buffaloes to the accused instead of the petitioner trust, and what are the principles governing interim custody of animals under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petitions, quashed the Magistrate's order dated 22/9/2014, and directed that the custody of the 13 she-buffaloes be given to the petitioner trust subject to conditions: producing animals before trial court as required, not transferring outside jurisdiction, maintaining proper records, and the trial court to expedite the trial.

Law Points

  • Interim custody of animals seized in cruelty cases
  • registered goshala's right to custody
  • Section 11 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960
  • Section 451 CrPC
  • Section 457 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (01) 109

Criminal Writ Petition No. 790 of 2014 with Criminal Writ Petition No. 789 of 2014, Criminal Writ Petition No. 791 of 2014, Criminal Writ Petition No. 943 of 2014

2015-01-16

S. B. Shukre

R. M. Daga, M. P. Khajanchi for petitioner; A. K. Bangadkar, APP for State; F. T. Mirza, C. Hussain for respondent No.2

Sarvodaya Goshala Charitable Trust

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petitions challenging the order of Judicial Magistrate releasing custody of seized she-buffaloes to the accused.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner trust sought quashing of the Magistrate's order and custody of the 13 she-buffaloes.

Filing Reason

The Magistrate released the animals to the accused instead of the petitioner trust, which is a registered goshala.

Previous Decisions

The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Wardha passed the order on 22/9/2014 in Misc. Criminal Application No. 453 of 2014.

Issues

Whether the Magistrate erred in releasing the custody of seized animals to the accused instead of a registered goshala. What are the principles governing interim custody of animals under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the trust is a registered goshala and willing to take custody and provide proper care, and the Magistrate ignored this. Respondents opposed, but the Court found the Magistrate's order unsustainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The object of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 is to prevent cruelty and ensure welfare of animals. A registered goshala is a suitable entity for interim custody, and the Magistrate must consider such entities before releasing animals to the accused.

Judgment Excerpts

By the order impugned herein, the learned Magistrate has released the custody of 13 she-buffaloes to respondent No.2, who is one of the accused persons in Crime No.3068 of 2014 for the offences punishable under Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to animals Act, 1960 read with Section 119 of the Bombay Police Act and also Sections 83 and 177 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The learned Magistrate has failed to consider the object of the Act, 1960 and the suitability of the petitioner trust.

Procedural History

The petitioner trust filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 790 of 2014 and connected petitions challenging the order dated 22/9/2014 of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Wardha in Misc. Criminal Application No. 453 of 2014 arising out of Crime No. 3068 of 2014. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 16/1/2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960: Section 11
  • Bombay Police Act: Section 119
  • Motor Vehicles Act: Sections 83, 177
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 451, 457
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Goshala's Petition for Custody of Seized Animals in Cruelty Case — Magistrate's Order Releasing Animals to Accused Quashed. The Court held that a registered goshala is a suitable entity for interim custody under the Prevent...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Setting Aside Appellate Decree for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the first appellate court's reversal of the trial court's findings was perverse and not based on evi...