Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Services of 45 Employees of a Cooperative Society. Termination Held Illegal for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 27 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 171
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, 45 employees of a cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging their termination of services. The termination was effected without any notice or inquiry, and without following the procedure under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court found that the termination was in gross violation of principles of natural justice and the statutory provisions. The court set aside the termination orders and directed the respondent society to reinstate the petitioners with continuity of service. However, considering that the petitioners had not worked during the period of termination and the financial position of the society, the court denied back wages. The court also directed that the reinstatement be effected within four weeks from the date of the order.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Termination of Service - Section 27 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Principles of Natural Justice - The petitioners, employees of a cooperative society, were terminated without any notice or inquiry. The court held that the termination was in violation of Section 27 of the Act and principles of natural justice, as the society failed to provide any opportunity of hearing before passing the termination order. The court set aside the termination and directed reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages. (Paras 1-7)

B) Cooperative Law - Reinstatement - Back Wages - Section 27 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - While setting aside the illegal termination, the court considered the fact that the petitioners had not worked during the intervening period and that the society may have financial constraints. The court directed reinstatement with continuity of service but denied back wages, holding that the grant of back wages is not automatic and depends on the facts of each case. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of services of the petitioners by the respondent cooperative society without following the procedure under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and without affording an opportunity of hearing is legal and valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the termination orders, and directed the respondent society to reinstate the petitioners with continuity of service but without back wages. Reinstatement to be effected within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Section 27 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act 1960
  • termination without notice
  • termination without inquiry
  • reinstatement with continuity of service
  • back wages
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (12) 401

Writ Petition No. 12400 of 2025

2025-12-20

2025:BHC-KOL:4237-DB

Prafulla Sawalaram Parulekar and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of services of employees of a cooperative society.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of termination orders and reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Filing Reason

Termination of services without notice or inquiry, in violation of Section 27 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the termination of the petitioners was in violation of Section 27 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and principles of natural justice. Whether the petitioners are entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that their termination was without any notice or inquiry, violating Section 27 of the Act and principles of natural justice. Respondent society argued that the termination was justified due to misconduct and financial constraints.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of an employee of a cooperative society without following the procedure under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and without affording an opportunity of hearing is illegal and violative of principles of natural justice. Reinstatement with continuity of service is the appropriate remedy, but back wages may be denied if the employee did not work during the intervening period or if the employer has financial constraints.

Judgment Excerpts

The termination of the petitioners is in gross violation of principles of natural justice and Section 27 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioners are entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service, but considering the facts, back wages are denied.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging their termination. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 20 December 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 27
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Grant Case: Upholds Resumption of Granted Land Under Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978 Despite Delay. The court held that the absence of a limitation period in the Act and the welfare nature of the legislation al...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Taluk Office as Government Failed to Justify Need; Alternative Lands Available on Main Road. Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Quashed as Notification Issued on 23 Ju...