Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Excise License Suspension for Lack of Personal Hearing. Suspension Order Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Excise Rules, 1963.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Lokranjan Breweries Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated March 14, 2024, passed by the State Excise Department suspending their excise license. The petitioners contended that the suspension order was passed without granting them any opportunity of hearing, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The court, after hearing both sides, observed that the impugned order was passed without affording any personal hearing to the petitioners. The court held that such an order cannot be sustained in law as it is in clear violation of the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the suspension order and directed the respondents to restore the license. The court also clarified that the respondents are at liberty to proceed further in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The petition was allowed in the above terms.

Headnote

A) Excise Law - Suspension of License - Natural Justice - Rule 8 of the Maharashtra Excise Rules, 1963 - The petitioners challenged the suspension of their excise license without being afforded a personal hearing. The court held that the suspension order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was granted before the adverse order. The impugned order was quashed and set aside. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suspension of an excise license without granting a personal hearing to the licensee is valid in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated March 14, 2024 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to restore the license. The respondents are at liberty to proceed further in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. Rule made absolute in the above terms.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • right to be heard
  • suspension of excise license
  • Maharashtra Excise Rules
  • 1963
  • Rule 8
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (12) 164

Writ Petition No. 6071 of 2024

2025-12-09

Soma Sekhar Sundaresan, J.

Venkatesh Dhond, Senior Advocate a/w Akshay Patil, Aditya Bapat, Akshay Kamble and Neha Patil i/b Vivaka Partners, for the Petitioners; Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP, for Respondent-State.

Lokranjan Breweries Private Limited & Anr

State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary, State Excise Department & Anr

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging suspension of excise license.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of suspension order dated March 14, 2024 and restoration of license.

Filing Reason

Suspension order passed without granting personal hearing.

Issues

Whether the suspension of excise license without personal hearing is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the suspension order was passed without any opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. Respondents did not contest the lack of hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

An order suspending an excise license without granting a personal hearing to the licensee is violative of the principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order has been passed without affording any personal hearing to the petitioners. Such an order cannot be sustained in law.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2024, heard on November 13, 2025, and pronounced on December 9, 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Excise Rules, 1963: Rule 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Intervention in Industrial Dispute. Petitioners Not Necessary Parties Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Excise License Suspension for Lack of Personal Hearing. Suspension Order Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Excise Rules, 1963.