Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pension Under Old Pension Scheme — Petitioner's Service in 100% Grant-in-Aid Institution Prior to Cut-off Date Qualifies for Pension. The Court directed the respondents to consider and sanction pension as a special case, treating service from 11 October 2002 to 31 March 2012 as qualifying service.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 166
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Smt. Suvarna Harishchandra Chavan, an Art Teacher aged 68, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking pension under the Old Pension Scheme. She had served as a full-time Art Teacher at Respondent No. 6, Kamalini Karnabadhir Vidayalaya, a special school for the deaf, from 1 December 1998 to 10 October 2002 on an unaided post, and from 11 October 2002 until her superannuation on 31 March 2012 on an aided basis. The institution received 100% grants-in-aid from the Government. The Petitioner's pension proposal was returned by the authorities vide order dated 29 December 2015 on the ground that she had not put in qualifying service. The core legal issue was whether the Petitioner was working in an institution that received 100% grants-in-aid prior to the cut-off date of 1 November 2005, as per Government Resolution dated 31 October 2005, making her eligible for the Old Pension Scheme. The Petitioner argued that her service from 11 October 2002 to 31 March 2012, being 9 years 5 months 18 days, constituted qualifying service. The respondents contended that the Petitioner did not meet the eligibility criteria. The Court, after considering submissions, held that the Petitioner was indeed working in a 100% grant-in-aid institution prior to the cut-off date and was entitled to pension under the Old Pension Scheme. The Court allowed the petition, quashed the order dated 29 December 2015, and directed the respondents to consider and sanction the Petitioner's pension as a special case, treating her service from 11 October 2002 to 31 March 2012 as qualifying service.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pension - Old Pension Scheme - Eligibility - Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005 - The issue was whether the Petitioner, an Art Teacher in a special school, was entitled to pension under the Old Pension Scheme. The Court held that since the institution received 100% grants-in-aid prior to the cut-off date of 01.11.2005, the Petitioner's service from 11.10.2002 to 31.03.2012 qualified for pension. The Court directed the respondents to consider and sanction pension as a special case. (Paras 2, 4, 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Petitioner was working in an Institution which received 100% grants-in-aid from the Government, prior to the cut-off date of 01.11.2005, in the light of the Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005, so as to make him eligible for Pension as per the Old Pension Scheme.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the Writ Petition, quashed the order dated 29/12/2015, and directed Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to consider and sanction the Petitioner's pension as a special case, treating the service rendered from 11.10.2002 to 31.03.2012 as qualifying service for pension.

Law Points

  • Pension eligibility
  • Old Pension Scheme
  • cut-off date
  • qualifying service
  • grant-in-aid institution
  • Government Resolution 31.10.2005
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-AS:56901-DB

WRIT PETITION NO. 12107 OF 2022

2025-12-18

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ASHWIN D. BHOBE

2025:BHC-AS:56901-DB

Mr. Satyajeet Rajeshirke for Petitioner, Mr. S.H. Kankal AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, Mr. Shrishail Sakhare for Respondent No.4

Smt. Suvarna Harishchandra Chavan

The State of Maharashtra, The Accountant General, The Commissioner, Commissionerate of Disability Affairs, District Social Welfare Officer, The Chairman, Bharatiya Stri-Jeevan Vikas Parishad, The Headmaster, Kamalini Karnabadhir Vidayalaya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition seeking pension under Old Pension Scheme

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 29/12/2015 returning pension proposal, direction to consider and grant pension and retirement benefits, direction to consider service from 11.10.2002 to 31.03.2012 as qualifying service

Filing Reason

Petitioner's pension proposal was returned by authorities on ground of insufficient qualifying service

Previous Decisions

Order dated 29/12/2015 returning pension proposal

Issues

Whether the Petitioner was working in an Institution which received 100% grants-in-aid from the Government, prior to the cut-off date of 01.11.2005, in the light of the Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005, so as to make him eligible for Pension as per the Old Pension Scheme.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she served as full-time Art Teacher from 1/12/1998 to 10/10/2002 on unaided post and from 11.10.2002 till retirement on 31/03/2012 on aided basis in a special school receiving 100% grants-in-aid, and thus entitled to pension under Old Pension Scheme. Respondents contended that Petitioner did not put in qualifying service for pension.

Ratio Decidendi

A teacher working in a special school receiving 100% grants-in-aid from the Government prior to the cut-off date of 01.11.2005 is eligible for pension under the Old Pension Scheme, and the service rendered on aided basis after the cut-off date qualifies as pensionable service.

Judgment Excerpts

The question is as to whether the Petitioner was working in an Institution which received 100% grants-in-aid from the Government, prior to the cut-off date of 01.11.2005, in the light of the Government Resolution dated 31.10.2005, so as to make him eligible for Pension as per the Old Pension Scheme. The Petitioner has not been granted the pension by the competent authority, concluding that he has not put in qualifying service, only by the order dated 29/12/2015.

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 12107 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 29/12/2015 returning her pension proposal. The Court heard the matter on 18/12/2025 and allowed the petition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pension Under Old Pension Scheme — Petitioner's Service in 100% Grant-in-Aid Institution Prior to Cut-off Date Qualifies for Pension. The Court directed the respondents to consider and sanction pension as ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Based Solely on Prosecutrix's Testimony Unsustainable Where Medical and FSL Reports Do Not Support Prosecution Case.