Bombay High Court Partly Allows Petition by Public Corporation Against State Information Commission's Order Directing Departmental Enquiry Under RTI Act. Commission Exceeded Its Powers Under Section 18 of Right to Information Act, 2005 by Ordering Enquiry Into Delay, Which Is Not Permitted Under the Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 49
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation, a Government of Maharashtra undertaking, challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission (respondent No.2) on a complaint filed by respondent No.1, Saurabh Agrawal, under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The impugned order directed the petitioner to supply photocopies of documents as demanded by respondent No.1 after inspection, and further directed the Joint Managing Director of the petitioner to cause an enquiry by a competent officer regarding the delay caused by officers in giving inspection and supplying photocopies. The petitioner argued that inspection of all records had already been given and photocopies of 4419 pages had been supplied, and that the grievance was non-existent. The petitioner also contended that the State Information Commission had no power under Section 18 to direct a departmental enquiry. The court examined the scope of Section 18 of the RTI Act and held that the Commission's powers are limited to inquiring into complaints regarding refusal or delay in providing information, and do not extend to directing disciplinary proceedings against officers. The court found that the direction for a departmental enquiry was beyond the powers conferred by the Act. Consequently, the court quashed the impugned order to the extent it directed the enquiry, but upheld the direction to supply photocopies, noting that the petitioner had already complied with that part. The petition was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Right to Information - Powers of Information Commission - Section 18 of Right to Information Act, 2005 - The State Information Commission, while dealing with a complaint under Section 18, has no power to direct a public authority to conduct a departmental enquiry against its officers for delay in providing information. The Commission's powers are limited to ensuring compliance with the RTI Act and do not extend to directing disciplinary proceedings. (Paras 5-6)

B) Right to Information - Scope of Section 18 - Section 18 of Right to Information Act, 2005 - The Commission can only inquire into complaints regarding refusal to provide information, delay, or other violations under the Act, but cannot issue directions for departmental enquiries. Such directions are beyond the scope of the Act. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Information Commission, while exercising powers under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, can direct a public authority to conduct a departmental enquiry against its officers for delay in providing information.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is partly allowed. The impugned order passed by the State Information Commission is quashed to the extent it directs the Joint Managing Director of the petitioner-Corporation to cause an enquiry by a competent officer regarding the delay. The rest of the order is not interfered with.

Law Points

  • Section 18 of RTI Act does not confer power to direct departmental enquiry
  • Information Commission's powers limited to ensuring compliance with RTI Act
  • No power to impose penalties or direct disciplinary action
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (12) 112

Writ Petition No.4534 of 2013

2014-12-09

Z.A. Haq

Shri D.N. Kukday for petitioner, Dr. Anjan De for respondent No.1

Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation

Saurabh Agrawal, State Information Commissioner

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of State Information Commission under Section 18 of RTI Act directing supply of documents and departmental enquiry.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the impugned order passed by the State Information Commission.

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the order of the State Information Commission which directed supply of photocopies and a departmental enquiry for delay.

Previous Decisions

State Information Commission passed order on 08-11-2012 directing inspection and supply of documents, and later impugned order directing enquiry.

Issues

Whether the State Information Commission has power under Section 18 of the RTI Act to direct a public authority to conduct a departmental enquiry against its officers for delay in providing information.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that inspection and photocopies of 4419 pages had already been provided, and the grievance was non-existent. Petitioner argued that the State Information Commission has no power under Section 18 to direct a departmental enquiry. Respondent No.1 argued in support of the Commission's order.

Ratio Decidendi

The State Information Commission, while exercising powers under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, has no authority to direct a public authority to conduct a departmental enquiry against its officers. The Commission's powers are limited to inquiring into complaints regarding refusal or delay in providing information and ensuring compliance with the Act, but do not extend to ordering disciplinary proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The State Information Commission while considering the application filed by the respondent No.1 under Section 18 of the Act of 2005 has no power to direct the petitioner-Corporation to conduct the departmental enquiry. The direction given by the State Information Commission to the Joint Managing Director of the petitioner-Corporation to cause conducting of enquiry by the competent officer in respect of the grievance of the respondent No.1 about the delay caused by the officers is beyond the powers conferred on the State Information Commission under the Act of 2005.

Procedural History

Respondent No.1 filed a complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act before the State Information Commission. The Commission passed an order on 08-11-2012 directing inspection and supply of documents. Subsequently, the Commission passed the impugned order directing supply of photocopies and a departmental enquiry. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Right to Information Act, 2005: Section 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Petition by Public Corporation Against State Information Commission's Order Directing Departmental Enquiry Under RTI Act. Commission Exceeded Its Powers Under Section 18 of Right to Information Act, 2005 by Ordering En...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced for Land and Fruit Trees. Land's Potentiality and Income from Trees Considered for Fair Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.