High Court of Bombay Allows Women Fishermen Cooperative to Continue Fishing Contract Pending Policy Consideration — Legitimate Expectation of Renewal Based on Exemplary Performance. Court Directs State to Consider Framing Policy for Allotting Fishing Rights to Women's Cooperatives Under Fisheries Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 62
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ambika Mahila Matsyavyavasayik Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., is a cooperative society formed exclusively by women from the fishermen community, with 52 women members. It was granted fishing rights for the Waghadi Project tank from 1 June 2006 to 30 June 2011. During this period, the society performed exemplary work and was selected by the National Fisheries Development Board, Hyderabad, for a pilot project financed by the Government of India to increase fish productivity. The society received Rs. 4,60,000 (50% of the total finance) on 19 April 2011 and utilized it to introduce fish seeds in the tank between 31 October 2010 and 27 February 2011. Its members received special training from experts. After the contract expired, the society sought renewal or extension, but the respondents initiated a fresh allotment process. The society filed a writ petition seeking to continue fishing operations and for a direction to frame a policy for women's cooperatives. The court considered the society's legitimate expectation based on its performance and recognition. The court directed the respondents to consider the society's representation and the feasibility of a policy for women's cooperatives within three months. Pending that decision, the society was allowed to continue fishing operations in the same tank subject to payment of the same fees as last paid, and the respondents were restrained from creating third-party rights. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Legitimate Expectation - The petitioner, a women-only cooperative, had a legitimate expectation of being considered for renewal or extension of its fishing contract given its exemplary performance and recognition by the National Fisheries Development Board. The court held that the respondents must consider the petitioner's representation and the policy for women's cooperatives before finalizing any fresh allotment (Paras 1-10).

B) Fisheries Law - Allotment of Fishing Rights - Policy for Women's Cooperatives - The court directed the respondents to consider the feasibility of framing a policy for allotting fishing rights to women's cooperatives, as the petitioner was the only such society formed exclusively by women members from the fishermen community (Paras 2-10).

C) Interim Relief - Continuation of Fishing Operations - Pending the decision on the petitioner's representation and policy consideration, the court ordered that the petitioner be allowed to continue fishing operations in the Waghadi Project tank, subject to payment of the same fees as last paid, and that no third-party rights be created (Para 10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, a women-only fishermen cooperative, is entitled to continue fishing operations in the Waghadi Project tank pending a fresh allotment process, and whether the respondents should be directed to consider a policy for allotting fishing rights to women's cooperatives.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court disposed of the petition with directions: (1) Respondents to consider petitioner's representation and feasibility of policy for women's cooperatives within three months; (2) Pending decision, petitioner allowed to continue fishing operations in Waghadi Project tank subject to payment of same fees as last paid; (3) Respondents restrained from creating third-party rights in the tank.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • legitimate expectation
  • policy consideration for women's cooperatives
  • interim relief pending fresh allotment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (12) 111

Writ Petition No. 4292 of 2013

2014-12-02

Z.A. Haq

Shri M.V. Samarth for petitioner, Smt. Rashi Deshpande (AGP) for respondent Nos.1 and 5, Ms. Tajwar Khan (AGP) for respondent Nos.2 to 4, Shri A.R. Patil for respondent No.6

Ambika Mahila Matsyavyavasayik Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking continuation of fishing rights and direction to frame policy for women's cooperatives

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to continue fishing operations in Waghadi Project tank and for respondents to consider framing a policy for allotting fishing rights to women's cooperatives

Filing Reason

Petitioner's fishing contract expired and respondents initiated fresh allotment process without considering petitioner's representation for renewal or extension

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to continue fishing operations pending fresh allotment based on legitimate expectation Whether the respondents should be directed to consider a policy for allotting fishing rights to women's cooperatives

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that it is the only women-only cooperative, performed exemplary work, was recognized by National Fisheries Development Board, and had legitimate expectation of renewal Respondents opposed the petition, stating that the contract had expired and fresh allotment was required

Ratio Decidendi

A cooperative society with exemplary performance and recognition has a legitimate expectation of being considered for renewal or extension of its fishing contract. The state should consider framing a policy to promote women's cooperatives in the fisheries sector.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitionerSociety is formed exclusively by women who are predominantly from fishermen community. It is undisputed that the petitionerSociety was given the contract of fishing rights in respect of Waghadi Project from 0162006 till 3062011. The National Fisheries Development Board, Hyderabad selected it for implementation of the scheme for increasing the productivity of fishes under the Pilot Project financed by the Government of India.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 4292 of 2013 before the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, seeking continuation of fishing rights and policy direction. The court heard the parties and disposed of the petition on 2 December 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Fisheries Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Allows Women Fishermen Cooperative to Continue Fishing Contract Pending Policy Consideration — Legitimate Expectation of Renewal Based on Exemplary Performance. Court Directs State to Consider Framing Policy for Allotting Fishi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Restaurant's Challenge to Closing Hours Under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. Petitioner's Request for Exemption from Section 19(1) Timings Rejected as State Government Lacks Power to Grant Individual Exemptions...