Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Smt. Kashi Babuli Chari, an 85-year-old widow and fruit vendor, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the learned District Judge-I, Mapusa, dated 20.05.2013, which dismissed her application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition. The delay pertained to challenging a judgment/order and decree passed on 20.05.2013. The petitioner argued that due to her advanced age (over 85 years), illness (hypertension and diabetes), and confinement to bed, she could not understand legal procedures and was unable to take timely steps. She also claimed she was not given adequate hearing during the appeal. The respondents opposed the condonation, arguing that the medical certificate did not specify bed rest and that the petitioner had other means to pursue the matter. The High Court, after hearing both sides, found that the learned District Judge had misconstrued the evidence and discarded the medical certificate without proper justification. The court emphasized that a liberal approach should be adopted in condonation of delay cases, especially for illiterate and aged litigants. The court set aside the impugned order, condoned the delay, and directed the District Judge to hear the review application on merits within three months. The writ petition was allowed.
Headnote
A) Limitation Act - Condonation of Delay - Sufficient Cause - Section 5 - Old Age and Illness - The petitioner, an 85-year-old fruit vendor, sought condonation of delay in filing a review petition against a judgment dated 20.05.2013, citing old age, sickness, hypertension, and diabetes. The District Judge dismissed the application, but the High Court held that the medical certificate and the petitioner's feeble stature constituted sufficient cause, and the delay was condoned in the interest of justice. (Paras 3-6)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the learned District Judge erred in dismissing the application for condonation of delay filed by the petitioner, an 85-year-old fruit vendor, on grounds of old age and illness constituting sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Final Decision
The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order dated 20.05.2013, condoned the delay, and directed the learned District Judge to hear the review application on merits within three months from the date of the order.
Law Points
- Condonation of delay
- sufficient cause
- liberal approach
- old age and illness
- Section 5 Limitation Act
- 1963
Case Details
2014 LawText (BOM) (12) 141
WRIT PETITION NO. 752 OF 2014
Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deep Shirokar, Advocate for the Petitioner; Mr. Sarvesh Kamat Mayenkar, Advocate for the Respondents
Sheetal Shivram Chari and Shivram Savlo Chari
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petition challenging the order of the District Judge dismissing an application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition.
Remedy Sought
The petitioner sought condonation of delay to allow her review application to be heard on merits.
Filing Reason
The petitioner, an 85-year-old fruit vendor, was unable to file the review petition within the limitation period due to old age, sickness, hypertension, and diabetes.
Previous Decisions
The learned District Judge-I, Mapusa, dismissed the application for condonation of delay in Civil Misc. Application no. 4 of 2014.
Issues
Whether the petitioner's old age and illness constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Whether the learned District Judge erred in discarding the medical certificate and misconstruing the evidence.
Submissions/Arguments
Petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner is over 85 years old, a fruit vendor, illiterate, and was sick with hypertension and diabetes, confined to bed, preventing her from taking legal steps. The medical certificate was produced but discarded by the District Judge.
Respondents' counsel argued that the medical certificate did not specify bed rest and that the petitioner had other means to take steps, and no sufficient cause was shown.
Ratio Decidendi
In condonation of delay cases, a liberal approach should be adopted, especially for illiterate and aged litigants. Old age and illness, supported by medical evidence, constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the court should not discard such evidence without proper reasoning.
Judgment Excerpts
The Petitioner is more than 85 years old and is a fruit vendor in the market and, as such, did not understand the exigencies of the legal procedures.
The learned Judge has misconstrued the material produced on record in support of the case of the Petitioner that there was a sufficient cause by discarding the medical certificate produced by the Petitioner.
Considering the feeble stature of the Petitioner, the delay deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice.
Procedural History
The petitioner filed a review petition against a judgment/order and decree dated 20.05.2013. The review was filed with a delay, and the petitioner filed an application for condonation of delay (Civil Misc. Application no. 4 of 2014) before the District Judge-I, Mapusa, which was dismissed. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging that dismissal.
Acts & Sections
- Limitation Act, 1963: Section 5
